Taiwan's international sporting profile remains reliant on the efforts of outstanding individuals such as baseballer Wang Chien-ming (
If Taiwanese are to take themselves seriously, and expect others to treat them with respect, then there are certain standards of behavior in the nation's name that must be upheld by its officers. This is no less true for individuals working in high-profile positions in seemingly apolitical areas such as sports.
Wu Ching-kuo (
This is wishful thinking at best, whether or not both sides can claim political capital from the torch's route. Indeed, it is laughable that sports -- which China sees more as nationalistic weapons than forums for constructively interacting with other nations -- will defuse tensions given how poverty-stricken the sporting culture of both countries is.
Ideally, if Wu were acting in Taiwan's interests, he would insist that the torch only enter Taiwan if it is not used to bolster Chinese propaganda. But there's little hope of that. Wu is serving on the Beijing Olympic Games Coordination Commission, so we can expect that he will be well-behaved and not do or say anything that would embarrass his superiors.
However, when Wu was asked if Taiwanese and Chinese should march under the same flag -- like athletes from North and South Korea -- he came out with the astonishing response that, according to a Chinese source, "it was still too early to speculate, as the political climate in Taiwan might change."
If Wu did say this, then he is a fool and should be disowned and any association between him and Taiwanese sporting pursuits permanently severed as far as the government is able.
But we cannot be optimistic that the government will do this, given that the Chen administration and its tag team of underperforming premiers have paralyzed themselves with cowardice in acting on issues over which it has the authority to act swiftly and without legislative interference.
In the meantime, here are a few questions for Wu.
First: Whose flag should the athletes march under? The Chinese are hardly likely to march under the Olympic flag, and especially not at home. And there's not much else to choose from.
And second: Has Wu divorced himself so far from Taiwanese public sentiment that he would consider his language to be inoffensive to more than a few Taiwanese independence blowhards?
Taiwanese sport suffers because its administrators are underfunded, undermanned and, in many if not most cases, incompetent and embarrassingly ignorant of the sports they represent.
Taiwanese sport will suffer even more if the government does not have the guts to disassociate itself from this increasingly shifty member of the politically mercenary IOC.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS