Pan-blue lawmakers on the legislature's Procedure Committee on Tuesday once again blocked a number of bills from being put on the legislative agenda, despite a directive from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
The blocked bills included the long-stalled arms procurement budget, nominees for the Control Yuan and chief state prosecutor, draft legislation on the handling of stolen political party assets and the unfreezing of government budgets.
Ma's comments that his party would consider reviewing the arms procurement package and Control Yuan confirmations were completely ignored by his party's legislators, making people wonder if Ma can really be considered an effective leader when his party caucus disregards his directives.
When Ma assumed the KMT chairmanship in June last year, many people hoped that under his leadership the party would become a loyal opposition, reviewing draft legislation on its merits instead of opposing proposals just to oppose them.
Even critics expressed the hope that Ma would fulfill promises made by his predecessor Lien Chan (
To prove he is a determined party chairman -- and that he has the makings of a presidential candidate -- Ma must keep his promises and exert pressure on his party's caucus to review the long-stalled bills that matter to the people's wellbeing.
Maybe the problem is not Ma's inability to lead, but his unwillingness to make tough decisions and then stick with them. Ma often appears afraid to call the shots, especially when it comes to reining in his party's lawmakers. The best he can come up with is a weak "I will respect the caucus' decision."
The Cabinet's request to buy six Patriot PAC-3 anti-missile batteries, a squadron of 12 anti-submarine P-3C helicopters and eight diesel-electric submarines has been stalled so long there must be cobwebs on the paperwork. The watchdog Control Yuan, whose job it is to monitor the conduct of the government and civil servants, has been idle since Jan. 31 last year when the terms of its previous members expired, yet the opposition continues to refuse to review the list of nominees submitted by the president.
The KMT, as the largest opposition party, has been successful in paralyzing the Democratic Progressive Party administration by refusing to review almost all government-sponsored bills in the legislature. The people of Taiwan, however, are the ultimate victims of this long-running farce.
If Ma could start living up to his commitments and get his party caucus to follow his instructions, he would undoubtedly win respect from the public.
If Ma wants to become president and lead his party's return to power in 2008, he has to stop relying on his popularity as the KMT's leading candidate and actually do something worth voting for.
As the 2008 presidential election draws nearer, the public is waiting to see if Ma has any substance behind his dazzling facade, or if he is content to remain little more than a cardboard cut-out.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS