The media exerts a great influence in Taiwan, but in the recent political tensions they have departed from their traditional role and played the part of a provocateur and instigator.
The media have been using their powerful influence in a way that is fundamentally flawed and this will certainly leave a mark on the history of Taiwan's political scene.
Many of the nation's media outlets continue to operate in a mode that has changed little since the authoritarian rule of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). The control of these outlets remains essentially monopolistic. Last year, the Chinese-language China Times newspaper acquired a number of other media outlets in preparation for forming an alliance spanning various media formats.
In a democratic society, the normal function of the media is to report on major events and offer analysis and criticism based on facts. This role can have a major positive impact on a modern society's politics, public policy and public affairs, and thus is one of the pillars of democratic governance.
However, when the media outlets begin to use unverified information in their reports, the media become both judge and jury, acting on information they have themself generated. There is great potential for abuse if this information turns out to be flawed or biased. This can be seen in some political talk shows that have made their reputation by using their self-generated, so-called "revelations" to accuse people and then find them guilty.
Clearly, when they "report" the news, many media outlets fabricate their stories. When newspapers go so far as to run inflammatory headlines atop these stories, the situation grows even more serious.
Fortunately, such practices often backfire if they they are taken too far. When Taiwan's newspapers are discovered to have cooked up a particular issue to an unacceptable extent, they are required to make a formal apology.
Although police investigators are often not allowed to reveal any details related to a case in progress, media outlets frequently run stories -- based on leaks -- containing very detailed information about the investigation.
To get to the bottom of these cases, it is informative to identify the parties that might have benefitted from the leak.
Sadly, in many cases, it is the media, in collusion with certain muckrakers, that have used the leaked details -- which are still under investigation and thus not proven -- to make up stories. If a story lacks substance, many of the nation's media outlets have no problem with fleshing it out with unproven allegations.
One possible result of the current political climate is that President Chen Shui-bian's (
On the surface, it seems the media have made a great contribution to the investigation into Chen's alleged wrongdoings.
However, certain media outlets' efforts to falsify news or coerce the courts into ruling a certain way violate journalistic ethics and depart from the spirit of democracy. This is a pathetic way for the media to behave and one that history will condemn.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a research fellow in the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS