The ultimate aim of unlimited warfare is to make your enemy do things that run counter to his interests.
Although the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) advocates Taiwanese independence, it has come under the influence of certain Taiwanese media outlets, businesspeople and academics who have led it into Beijing's trap of "unification through economic means" by adopting an "active opening" toward China.
Having sown the seeds of its own misfortune, Taiwan is now faced with economic stagnation and popular discontent. The red-clad throngs occupying Ketagalan Boulevard and calling for President Chen Shui-bian's (
But even though unlimited warfare is omnipresent, it is not omnipotent. Prior to 1987, Taiwan responded to any whiff of cooperation with China with three absolute principles: No contact, no negotiations and no compromise. This is why China's unlimited warfare initially proved ineffective in Taiwan. Non-governmental contact between the two sides commenced in 1987 after Taiwan allowed its citizens to visit relatives in China.
When former president Lee Teng-hui (
When Chen came to power in 2000, he announced his "four noes and one without" pledge in dealing with cross-strait affairs, rashly halting the transformation of Taiwan into an independent political entity. In 2001, the DPP passed a resolution for the development of Taiwan's economy, which also set the tone for cross-strait economic integration.
This began a six-year period in which the governing and opposition parties competed on who could open up to China the fastest. This is the cause of the difficulties that Taiwan faces today.
The misconception that cross-strait economic integration and the pursuit of Taiwanese sovereignty can co-exist set back the struggle to establish Taiwan as an independent political entity. That is why the DPP only barely won the 2004 presidential election and suffered defeat in the 2004 year-end legislative elections and last year's local government elections.
When pan-blue supporters lodged numerous protests on Ketagalan Boulevard following the 2004 presidential election, a group of DPP politicians formulated a "new culture" proposal, urging their comrades to refrain from speaking of their love for Taiwan and acknowledge that Chinese culture was the core of Taiwanese culture.
Their proposition was nothing more than a legitimization of the behavior of those who opposed the outcome of the 2004 presidential election. After failing to pursue localization, the DPP soon lost public support.
There was another case of Taiwan taking sides with the enemy last March. After Beijing promulgated its "Anti-Secession Law," the Taiwanese government adopted a hands-off approach toward former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chen (
The Chen government's failed policies and corruption have been important factors in Taiwan's decline. However, it is the astounding effectiveness of China's covert unlimited warfare that has made the DPP leadership unwittingly side with the enemy.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS