Bribery, embezzlement, fraud and other types of corruption were deeply entrenched during the 50-year reign of the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration. That system was inherited by President Chen Shui-bian (
It is obvious that one of the reasons for this is the historical and continuing pro-KMT partisanship within the media. The majority of the media confuse fabrication with fact, and present propaganda as news. The people need, but do not demand, better journalism. Unbridled partisanship is at once a cause and an effect of the nation's political irrationality. This letter is to call attention to a less obvious part of the political irrationality.
Throughout most of the 50-year KMT regime, political opposition was not allowed. There was just the KMT party-state government and the people. Any criticism of the government or act of civil disobedience, was the people's criticism and a demonstration of the people's will. As recently as 20 years ago, there was still no opposition organized enough to have a name: there was only the generic term dangwai, meaning "outside of the KMT."
Twenty years ago the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) emerged as the nation's first opposition party. It developed its role as a loyal and responsible opposition, and its candidates won many local offices. In 2000 its candidate, Chen, won the presidential election.
The KMT became an opposition party, but declined the role of a loyal and responsible opposition. Regaining the presidency, no matter what the cost to the country, was its only goal. It sought to frustrate and embarrass the government by a program of obstruction against every government plan, it disabled institutions such as the Control Yuan and it continued to demand that Chen go.
Although the opposition parties' use of their majority in the legislature is a clear expression of organized opposition power, the public seems to view street actions, including the present anti-Chen demonstration, as people's movements.
Nothing could be farther from the truth. From the recruitment of former DPP chairman Shih Ming-teh (施明德) as a figurehead leader, to the permission for weeks of 24-hour occupation of the streets granted by the KMT chairman from his perch in Taipei City Hall, the anti-Chen demonstration expresses the power of an undisciplined and disloyal opposition.
There will be no rhyme or reason to Taiwanese politics until people open their eyes, look at what the opposition parties do and measure the opposition parties by their performance as a loyal and responsible opposition.
Marty Wolff
Taipei County
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS