Likening former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh (
Dissident writer Cao Changqing (
Yesterday Cao told a press conference that the tactics of the Shih team resembled those used to whip up hysteria and violence in China's most infamous phase of the modern era.
Cao is not speaking mischievously. He is from China and knows what the Cultural Revolution did -- and is still doing, in pernicious ways -- to China. He supports Taiwan's right of self-determination, however it may manifest itself.
What Cao does not seem to understand is that the social and historical circumstances that shape Taiwanese behavior do not lend themselves to casual comparisons of Taiwanese protests to Chinese mass insanity.
In the Cultural Revolution, a people's youthful enthusiasm for bettering their country was nourished and manipulated by a charismatic thug to annihilate rivals within the Chinese Communist Party and groups within society that had the potential to weaken his grip on power.
It wasn't just about purging senior politicians and having a gullible proletariat let off some steam. It was about brainwashing millions of people, including children, into abandoning basic values of loyalty and propriety in the service of a cult leader's personal agenda. It was about killing as many ordinary people as necessary to protect that agenda.
It was a power play that nearly ruined a nation already suffering from the stupidity of the Great Leap Forward. And thirty years on, the social and spiritual effects of that era remain embedded in the Chinese psyche, including, in all likelihood, the fear of it coming to pass all over again in some form.
China's self-fulfilling prophecy of "chaos" therefore gives its rulers license to oppress, and temporary economic euphoria deflates the efforts of those who would lobby for a just and stable political structure.
Taiwanese do not have this history. Under Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rule there was savagery, but power was distributed sufficiently broadly -- and US oversight was sufficiently alert -- such that the "Republic of China" as a whole could work at making things better. And for most people, things got a lot better.
While there is a chance of conflict if Shih's campaign proceeds with its nationwide roadshow, there is no chance of this campaign appealing to Taiwan's "masses" -- as a mass revolution must -- because the economic interests of the great majority of Taiwanese are in conflict with the simplistic and naive (and disingenuous) messages of revolution and purity that the campaign is disseminating.
Put more simply, you can't stage a revolution on the back of complimentary lunch boxes.
Perhaps it was the color of these protesters' shirts that sent Cao Changqing over the edge and prompted him to warn of pending disaster. And he does make good points about the psychology of those involved and the techniques of organizers in rallying them.
Nevertheless, Cao would be doing his listeners and readers a service if he were to ease off on the alarmist rhetoric and factor in some positive attributes of this nation that will defuse a serious escalation: mutual respect, a sense of local community and, above all, a sense of perspective.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS