A preliminary meeting between Premier Su Tseng-chang (
While it is understandable that Su, the country's highest administrative official, would want to talk with the opposition, the topics they eventually discuss should focus strictly on issues of national importance, like the passage of the long-stalled arms procurement bill and legislation that impacts on people's lives.
The proposed Su-Ma meeting should not consist of negotiations on how to end the anti-President Chen Shui-bian (
It should not, as several media outlets reported earlier this week, be an opportunity for party heavyweights, in the hope of easing tensions, to act as mediators and conduct some sort of shady deal patching things up between Chen and the campaign's leader, Shih Ming-teh (
If that is Su's intention, he should be warned not to place too much stock in the meeting with Ma. After all, the ultimate goal of the opposition is for the president to step down.
There is no need for any political negotiation, nor is there a need for other politicians to get involved when it is Shih himself who needs to clean up his mess and formulate an exit strategy.
Shih was the one responsible for bringing the crowds to Ketagalan Boulevard in the first place, portraying himself as a martyr and claiming that he had written his will. It was he who said that he would stage the anti-Chen sit-in protest until "either I die or Chen dies."
Shih's campaign has succeeded in bringing only unrest, economic losses, renewed ethnic friction and traffic congestion, all of which are slowly eroding the campaign's momentum, let alone any support it may have had from the pan-green crowd.
However inconvenient things may get because of Shih's protest, Taiwan's leaders must not let the nation's democratic institutions be damaged by this momentary madness.
Taiwan has not worked to bring about democracy and establish a depoliticized system of law and order so that celebrities can make reckless statements, instigate street clashes, side with former autocrats -- and then expect to receive an audience with elected officials.
Why should anybody bother voting if, every time the nation finds itself in political strife, some self-proclaimed messiah appears and gathers a crowd of followers -- with opposition backing -- who demand that the head of state be deposed?
The president is elected by this nation. The length of his tenure should not be decided during a few secretive meetings between senior political figures from various parties.
Whatever negotiations go on in these closed-door meetings can only damage the nation's democratic mechanisms.
The most responsible action would be to allow the judiciary to do its job and continue with its investigation into the cases that have implicated the president's family and advisers.
As Ma himself often says: "Let everything be conducted in accordance with the law."
Indeed.
And as for Shih, the best exit strategy for him would be to swallow his pride, end his sit-in and go home.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS