Last Thursday, Keelung Mayor Hsu Tsai-li (許財利) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was sentenced to seven years in prison and deprived of his civil rights for eight years after being found guilty of corruption. He had used his position to facilitate a land deal for his own profit.
Last December, when Hsu was running for re-election, he was already under suspicion, but Taipei Mayor and KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) campaigned for him anyway and he won. In May, Hsu was formally indicted.
What was Ma's reaction? He refused to revoke Hsu's KMT membership because, he said, being indicted does not constitute guilt.
It is true: Indictment does not constitute guilt. Remember that as Point One.
In the meantime, former DPP chairman Shih Ming-teh (
The supposed theme of their anti-Chen campaign is "anti-corruption."
But is the president guilty of anything? No.
Has the president been indicted for anything? No.
Still, at Shih's and the pan-blue camp's insistence, a president who has not even been indicted must step down from office. Remember that as Point Two.
Who has been indicted? The president's son-in-law -- on insider trading.
Let us return to Point One. The aspersion of guilt in this case is not on the president but on his son-in-law. For Shih's Red Guard, the president must therefore step down.
We thus move on to Hau Lung-bin (
Hau Lung-bin, however, should not withdraw his candidacy because indictment does not constitute guilt. Besides, it is his father who is under scrutiny, and not him.
And he is KMT.
Ma's position on all of this is hard to define.
He flip-flops depending on who he is talking to. He has apologized and then he has not. He has said that an apology is not necessary.
After all, Hsu was first elected mayor when Lien Chan (
That latter remark may be debatable, but Ma seems to have forgotten we are not comparing corruption with corruption. Instead, we have a convicted, corrupt mayor being held up against a president who has not been convicted or even indicted.
There has been no rush by Shih Ming-teh's Red Guard to the ramparts of Keelung to say that justice has been done, that corruption has been found, and that Hsu Tsai-li should be hung from the highest tree.
As a matter of fact, we have heard no mention of the search for corruption in Keelung on in any other area where a pan-blue candidate is in office or in the running.
Point Three, therefore, is more of a question than a point: How long should the people of Taipei and Taiwan put up with the foolishness, hypocrisy and disruptiveness of Shih Ming-teh's Red Guard?
How long should the city have to pay for extra police hours, trash collection and obstruction of traffic and city services to satisfy the ego of a man who has long been out of a job, a man who has not won an election in over eight years but who hankers desperately for the limelight?
Jerome Keating is a Taiwan-based writer.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS