It is often difficult to predict how things will develop, and we sometimes don't know whether to laugh or cry at the results. Wang Li-ping (
Corruption is a complicated issue. It will not disappear because a sit-in protest tries to bring down an individual; rather, its minimization involves a serious and difficult political, economic and social process persistently pursued over the long term.
When it was revealed that the housekeeper of President Chen Shui-bian's (
But corruption is not the preserve of a single person or party. As the pan-blue and "red" camps accuse the government of graft, former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Chen Che-nan (
And although Wu Chun-li (
Hsu has the right of appeal, and only if the second instance renders a verdict of "guilty" can the Ministry of the Interior discharge Hsu. Asking for his resignation now is only a political and moral demand.
So despite the present anti-Chen campaign, it would seem to a neutral observer that the KMT has greater problems with corruption than the DPP.
We all hope to eliminate corruption, but that goal must not take precedence over the rule of law, and it must not be turned into a moral or political issue that disregards the law. If it does, it will become a trial in the court of public opinion. Experience tells us that even though corruption charges may be shocking, they do not always lead to a guilty verdict.
If people really want to punish corruption, they should bridge the gap between morality and legality, such as amending the law regulating civil servants' use of public funds, relaxing the conditions constituting a corruption charge, and stipulating that all government officials should be stood down if found guilty by a court in the first instance.
If the public insists that ousting every politician accused of a misdemeanor will eradicate corruption, the power to appoint and remove government officials will be in the hands of the media.
Because the scandal involving the Presidential Office is still under investigation, it is too early to predict the outcome. Forcing Chen to resign based on sensational accusations in the media and by lawmakers is unacceptable. The corruption charges against the first family are still under investigation, which means the first family is neither indicted nor sentenced. The public should give the judiciary more time and space.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of