After many years of celebrating the founding of the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan, this year's national day -- or Double Ten National Day -- looks like it will be marred by political protests and, perhaps ironically, by a core of pan-blue politicians who have long claimed steadfast loyalty to the ROC.
Shih Ming-teh (施明德), leader of the campaign seeking to oust President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), announced on Monday that he will lead thousands of protesters in another siege on the Presidential Office building on Double Ten day, blocking the front and rear entrances of the building to turn up the heat on Chen. He claimed that this was necessary to let the whole world know that the president must step down.
The anti-Chen protest is a PR move aimed at putting Chen on the spot as he plays host to a cohort of foreign diplomats and visitors, but the truth of the matter is that by doing this, Shih and his followers are simply bringing shame to everyone.
Taiwan already has its fair share of foreign policy difficulties. Under these circumstances, is it appropriate or acceptable to use this occasion to make a laughing stock of the nation in the international community? Is the Shih campaign's hatred toward Chen so deep that it is willing to embarrass him at the expense of the collective dignity?
This does not even mention the hint of violence that pervades the campaign -- organizers are calling it a "universal siege."
Chien Hsi-chieh, deputy head of the Shih camp, stressed that the event would be carried out in a peaceful manner. This is disingenuous: The campaign needs violence to retain the media's attention.
Will the Shih camp shoulder responsibility for such stupidity, or merely dismiss it as the "acts of a few over-enthusiastic individuals" as it did when reports of violent clashes between pro and anti-Chen protesters took place on Monday night in Kaohsiung and Tuesday night in Tainan?
The "universal siege" has gained the support of People First Party Chairman James Soong (
Double Ten day celebrates the start of the Wuchang Uprising on Oct. 10, 1911, which, under the leadership of Sun Yat-sen (
Given the Shih camp's determination to hold the "siege" on the ROC's national day, the DPP government might as well just call off the celebration altogether.
After all, what does the Wuchang Uprising have to do with Taiwan? Why celebrate an event in China that has only vague relevance for the lives of the vast majority of Taiwanese?
The ROC came into being at a time when Taiwan didn't even fall under its jurisdiction. In 1912, the nation was subject to another imperial power -- Japan. Celebrating Double Ten day here is akin to Taiwanese celebrating Thanksgiving -- it may once have been an important day in the world calender, but it's hardly ours.
Given that Shih and his followers couldn't care less about this year's national day, the public might as well take the chance to ponder when exactly Taiwan should hold its national celebration.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS