After many years of celebrating the founding of the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan, this year's national day -- or Double Ten National Day -- looks like it will be marred by political protests and, perhaps ironically, by a core of pan-blue politicians who have long claimed steadfast loyalty to the ROC.
Shih Ming-teh (施明德), leader of the campaign seeking to oust President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), announced on Monday that he will lead thousands of protesters in another siege on the Presidential Office building on Double Ten day, blocking the front and rear entrances of the building to turn up the heat on Chen. He claimed that this was necessary to let the whole world know that the president must step down.
The anti-Chen protest is a PR move aimed at putting Chen on the spot as he plays host to a cohort of foreign diplomats and visitors, but the truth of the matter is that by doing this, Shih and his followers are simply bringing shame to everyone.
Taiwan already has its fair share of foreign policy difficulties. Under these circumstances, is it appropriate or acceptable to use this occasion to make a laughing stock of the nation in the international community? Is the Shih campaign's hatred toward Chen so deep that it is willing to embarrass him at the expense of the collective dignity?
This does not even mention the hint of violence that pervades the campaign -- organizers are calling it a "universal siege."
Chien Hsi-chieh, deputy head of the Shih camp, stressed that the event would be carried out in a peaceful manner. This is disingenuous: The campaign needs violence to retain the media's attention.
Will the Shih camp shoulder responsibility for such stupidity, or merely dismiss it as the "acts of a few over-enthusiastic individuals" as it did when reports of violent clashes between pro and anti-Chen protesters took place on Monday night in Kaohsiung and Tuesday night in Tainan?
The "universal siege" has gained the support of People First Party Chairman James Soong (
Double Ten day celebrates the start of the Wuchang Uprising on Oct. 10, 1911, which, under the leadership of Sun Yat-sen (
Given the Shih camp's determination to hold the "siege" on the ROC's national day, the DPP government might as well just call off the celebration altogether.
After all, what does the Wuchang Uprising have to do with Taiwan? Why celebrate an event in China that has only vague relevance for the lives of the vast majority of Taiwanese?
The ROC came into being at a time when Taiwan didn't even fall under its jurisdiction. In 1912, the nation was subject to another imperial power -- Japan. Celebrating Double Ten day here is akin to Taiwanese celebrating Thanksgiving -- it may once have been an important day in the world calender, but it's hardly ours.
Given that Shih and his followers couldn't care less about this year's national day, the public might as well take the chance to ponder when exactly Taiwan should hold its national celebration.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means