Following the government's proposed budget for procuring 66 F-16C/D fighter jets from the US last month, the question of national defense -- the victim of partisan squabbling over the past two years -- is once again the focus of public attention. But, sadly Taiwan's security situation is still gloomy and its implications are seriously underestimated.
In order to show a willingness and determination to defend itself, the government allocated the budget to buy the F-16s before the US officially announced the deal. However opposition legislators objected to that. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lin Yu-fang (
As we are all too aware, the US government declared a package of arms for Taiwan in 2001. The opposition parties, including the KMT and the People First Party (PFP), have vetoed this arms procurement bill 56 times in the legislature since June 8, 2004, despite the fact that the arms budget was reduced from NT$480 billion (US$14.6 billion) to NT$6.2 billion. No doubt, the latest objections are just further excuses to block the arms budget.
In addition, when Defense News, a US weekly, revealed that the US has not agreed to the F-16 deal because the long-stalled arms procurement bill is still unresolved, KMT legislators adeptly brushed aside accusations directed at them. KMT Legislator Shuai Hua-min (
When we delve into Shuai's words, however, the truth is rather different. According to a report in the Taipei Times, (Aug. 31, 2006, p.3), a telegram sent to the National Defense Ministry from the US strongly blamed the Legislative Yuan for the long-delayed special arms procurement bill. One US senior official even warned that whether the arms procurement budget was passed in the Legislative Yuan or not in the next two months would not only demonstrate Taiwan's determination to defend itself, but be crucial to whether Taiwan-US relations would strengthen, stagnate or even go backward. After reading the message, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) admitted that the delay in the passage of the arms bill would impact national security.
No one would doubt the professionalism of the two opposition legislators -- the former a political scientist, the latter a retired lieutenant general -- and their patriotism. As China has approximately 800 ballistic missiles pointing at Taiwan and is adding missiles at an annual rate of 75 to 100, the opposition parties' obfuscation in the past six years is seriously eroding Taiwan's national security.
In 2003, the government allocated NT$28.4 billion to buy four Kidd-class destroyers, part of the arms package which US President George W. Bush approved in 2001. The opposition used all kinds of tactics to obstruct the passage of the arms bill, and even falsely accused the government of intentionally floating the budget. As a result of opposition threats to boycott the procurement, the budget was reduced to NT$28 billion. Consequently, the number of SM-2 missiles deployed on the four destroyers was cut to half its original figure, which considerably undermines the warships' fighting capability, according to Taiwanese naval officials.
Currently, there is a growing impression that Taiwan is neglecting its own defense, not only in the US government but also in think tanks and among academics. James Mulvenon, a prominent expert on Taiwan, bluntly comments that the reason Taiwan has been able to do this is its belief in a "blank check of military support from the United States." In other words, those who hold this view judge that Taiwan's current approach relies on potential US military intervention in any conflict with China, rather than bolstering its own capacity, to resist a Chinese attack.
On the other hand, Ted Galen Carpenter, a researcher at the Cato Institute, in his book America's Coming War With China: A Collision Course Over Taiwan argues that the US should disengage from Taiwan, because China's patience regarding the incorporation of Taiwan into China is wearing thin and a growing number of Taiwanese want independence, both of which could lead to war between the US and China.
Although Carpenter's view of the US-China war scenario and his prescription is not yet in the mainstream of Washington's foreign policy, this apocalyptic view practically reflects the core values of US foreign policy thinking that nothing is above national interests. That is to say, in order to safeguard national interests, it is possible that the US might be forced to abandon democratic Taiwan to totalitarian China, if it finds itself unable to compete militarily with Beijing.
With the serious security challenges facing Taiwan and the US strongly critical of Taiwan's laxness regarding its own defense, it is surprising that KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) claim that his party's repeated blocking of the arms bill is not only reasonable but is winning US respect for Taiwan's prudent attitude on the arms procurement issue. Furthermore, Ma solemnly argues that the KMT only supports "reasonable arms purchase," which means the purchased weapons should meet Taiwan's defense needs, its budget should not be a financial burden on the government, and all citizens support the arms purchase.
Ironically, these plausible arguments could soon become empty words. According to the latest reports, under pressure from the US, Ma has implied that the KMT will dramatically change its position on the long-delayed arms procurement bill when the new legislative session begins this month. If this is the case, what the KMT did over the past two years would be proved to be a politically-motivated farce at the expense of Taiwan's security.
The nation is at a security crossroads and further procrastination in arms procurement could threaten its very existence. Although it is still too early to say whether the arms bill will be passed or not, it will be the opposition's last chance to decide whether they want to improve Taiwan's defensive capabilities.
Tu Ho-ting is a Taiwan-based journalist and analyst.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS