A Chinese joke goes, "you won't know how low your government post is until you are in Beijing, you won't know how poor you are until you are in Shanghai and you won't know how unhealthy you are until you are in Hainan." To this one can now add: "You won't know that the Cultural Revolution is still going on until you are in Taiwan." Although the Cultural Revolution was launched by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) chairman Mao Zedong (毛澤東) and there is no Mao here, after observing the current situation, I tend to agree.
Mao launched the Cultural Revolution in the name of culture, but it was in fact aimed at toppling then Chinese president Liu Shaoqi (
Mao started the Cultural Revolution through government-controlled publications -- the People's Daily, the People's Liberation Daily and Hongqi Magazine. Their editorials, special reports and articles by members of the "proletarian headquarters" moulded public opinion. After the "red shock wave" was initiated, the nation moved in unison. Those who were named, were immediately criticized and denounced at public meetings. To protect themselves, officials at lower party levels disclosed information about people in their area or departments to label them all "monsters and demons."
These people -- referred to as the "five black classes," later expanded to eight -- were not arrested. Rather, they were exposed by the dictatorship of the masses and the "five red classes." They were paraded through the streets to be reproached, beaten and spat on. At the time, doctors would ask about one's background, and if there was any connectiontto someone in the five black classes, treatment was refused. China was immersed in a red terror.
The CCP spread slogans to encourage violence against "bad" people. The struggle aggravated social division, almost paralyzed the government and brought the economy to the brink of collapse.
After Mao seized power and successfully implemented the "grand revolutionary coalition," neither side approved of people from the other side. As a result, one faction emerged and took power -- still requiring approval from above -- while the five black categories were slowly rehabilitated.
Taiwan's culture of disclosure is similar to the Cultural Revolution's attitude to "question and attack everything." Taiwan's pro-independence forces are now being beaten and forced to apologize just like the "five black classes." Where is the democracy in that? In fact, China is the one manipulating this populism. Although there is no Mao here, China's influence is everywhere.
Finding a politician like Shih Ming-teh (施明德) who has never been to China is not easy. Unfortunately, the presence of people like fugitive tycoon Chen Yu-hao (陳由豪) in the Million Voices Against Corruption campaign -- as well as pro-unification politicians, entertainers who rely on the big China market and China-backed gangsters -- has changed Shih's position in the political spectrum. I worry that Shih's campaign will bring the Cultural Revolution back from the dead. The question is, is he in control?
The Cultural Revolution brought disaster to China and Beijing knows that if political intimidation and military coercion do not change Taiwan, it can use the campaign to depose Chen to create a cultural revolution to divide Taiwan.
But will deposing Chen satisfy China's ultimate goal of controlling Taiwan?
The government and opposition must gain a clear understanding of the issue.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taipei. Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS