While some Taiwanese men have been busy recently creating an uproar about the nation's power, some Taiwanese women have been carrying out a quiet and peaceful revolution to make Taiwan a more progressive country.
Last week, a private women's group held an international seminar on how Taiwan might become a signatory member of the UN's Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women.
At its 25th meeting last week, the Cabinet's Commission on Women's Rights Promotion passed an important proposal from its members from the private sector suggesting that the Cabinet and its agencies consider gender perspectives on important matters of national policy, as well as the establishment of an index to measure gender issues and an organization to track it.
The former meeting was an attempt by a non-governmental organization to push Taiwan toward more active and sensible international participation, and thereby demonstrate its society's resolve in pursuing democratization, the rule of law and human rights. The latter was an effort by the government to show Taiwan's commitment to achieving national gender equality by furthering a strategy of pushing gender issues into the mainstream.
Actually, the government already passed a set of policy guidelines and a white paper on women's issues two years and eight months ago. Aside from the usual custom of focusing the statement on topics relevant to women, these guidelines also addressed ideal gender relations in society.
Although there have been some improvements in women's rights since then, the lack of a mechanism dedicated to promoting gender equality in the Cabinet and its ministries means that there is still a long way to go to reach the gender equality goals laid out in the guidelines. This is mainly because there has been no way to effectively integrate the goals listed in the guidelines into Taiwan's overall national development plan.
If national development policy fails to consider gender issues, then the principle that all people should be able to enjoy the fruits of development could easily be forgotten. If the plan's main aim is to improve the fortunes of Taiwanese citizens, but fails to take gender perspectives into account, it's likely that only the privileged sex will benefit from it and as a result, gender relations within society will fail to improve.
In fact, this phenomenon has existed throughout the world for ages. At the UN's Fourth World Conference on Women in 1995, the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action finally called for the mainstreaming of women's issues to achieve the goal of gender equality.
Looking back on the past 10 years, as the world's advanced nations strive to develop into more civilized and progressive places, all of them have chosen to pursue a policy of mainstreaming gender issues in their development plans.
All kinds of important international organizations and forums have continued to investigate how to realize this policy in their programs. It has become clear that those countries that have integrated gender issues into the mainstream have not only improved gender relations in their societies, but have also become more competitive, leading indices that measure the development of human rights and economics.
If one wants to talk about the Democratic Progressive Party's political accomplishments since it came to power six years ago, perhaps it should be credited for laying the foundation for the mainstreaming of gender issues.
Its projects have included compiling statistics and monitoring gender issues in the ministries; training public officials at work to raise awareness of gender issues; passing a law ensuring that either of the sexes will have at least one-third of the seats on all committees, as well as fostering the sharing of governing power between the sexes; establishing ad hoc committees in different ministries to tackle gender issues, as well as appointing specific contact people to act as "gender focal points," to complete the unfinished work of earlier organizations; and setting up reviews of the budget for gender issues during this time.
If we also consider last week's passage of the resolution calling for the establishment of an index for evaluating gender issues as part of the national development plan, we can say that the mainstreaming of gender issues is not just beginning, but is already coming to fruition.
It is also critical to emphasize that the government has had to use practically none of its budget to complete these projects. If this isn't a peaceful revolution towards a more civilized and progressive country, then what is?
Annie Lee is a member of the Commission on Womens' Rights Promotion.
Translated by Marc Langer
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS