While some Taiwanese men have been busy recently creating an uproar about the nation's power, some Taiwanese women have been carrying out a quiet and peaceful revolution to make Taiwan a more progressive country.
Last week, a private women's group held an international seminar on how Taiwan might become a signatory member of the UN's Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women.
At its 25th meeting last week, the Cabinet's Commission on Women's Rights Promotion passed an important proposal from its members from the private sector suggesting that the Cabinet and its agencies consider gender perspectives on important matters of national policy, as well as the establishment of an index to measure gender issues and an organization to track it.
The former meeting was an attempt by a non-governmental organization to push Taiwan toward more active and sensible international participation, and thereby demonstrate its society's resolve in pursuing democratization, the rule of law and human rights. The latter was an effort by the government to show Taiwan's commitment to achieving national gender equality by furthering a strategy of pushing gender issues into the mainstream.
Actually, the government already passed a set of policy guidelines and a white paper on women's issues two years and eight months ago. Aside from the usual custom of focusing the statement on topics relevant to women, these guidelines also addressed ideal gender relations in society.
Although there have been some improvements in women's rights since then, the lack of a mechanism dedicated to promoting gender equality in the Cabinet and its ministries means that there is still a long way to go to reach the gender equality goals laid out in the guidelines. This is mainly because there has been no way to effectively integrate the goals listed in the guidelines into Taiwan's overall national development plan.
If national development policy fails to consider gender issues, then the principle that all people should be able to enjoy the fruits of development could easily be forgotten. If the plan's main aim is to improve the fortunes of Taiwanese citizens, but fails to take gender perspectives into account, it's likely that only the privileged sex will benefit from it and as a result, gender relations within society will fail to improve.
In fact, this phenomenon has existed throughout the world for ages. At the UN's Fourth World Conference on Women in 1995, the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action finally called for the mainstreaming of women's issues to achieve the goal of gender equality.
Looking back on the past 10 years, as the world's advanced nations strive to develop into more civilized and progressive places, all of them have chosen to pursue a policy of mainstreaming gender issues in their development plans.
All kinds of important international organizations and forums have continued to investigate how to realize this policy in their programs. It has become clear that those countries that have integrated gender issues into the mainstream have not only improved gender relations in their societies, but have also become more competitive, leading indices that measure the development of human rights and economics.
If one wants to talk about the Democratic Progressive Party's political accomplishments since it came to power six years ago, perhaps it should be credited for laying the foundation for the mainstreaming of gender issues.
Its projects have included compiling statistics and monitoring gender issues in the ministries; training public officials at work to raise awareness of gender issues; passing a law ensuring that either of the sexes will have at least one-third of the seats on all committees, as well as fostering the sharing of governing power between the sexes; establishing ad hoc committees in different ministries to tackle gender issues, as well as appointing specific contact people to act as "gender focal points," to complete the unfinished work of earlier organizations; and setting up reviews of the budget for gender issues during this time.
If we also consider last week's passage of the resolution calling for the establishment of an index for evaluating gender issues as part of the national development plan, we can say that the mainstreaming of gender issues is not just beginning, but is already coming to fruition.
It is also critical to emphasize that the government has had to use practically none of its budget to complete these projects. If this isn't a peaceful revolution towards a more civilized and progressive country, then what is?
Annie Lee is a member of the Commission on Womens' Rights Promotion.
Translated by Marc Langer
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS