The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) has announced it is applying for membership in the UN under the name "Republic of China (Taiwan)" this year. However, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has also discussed using the name "Taiwan" on its own. In so doing, the nation could apply for UN membership as a new member state and ask the General Assembly to re-examine UN Resolution 2758.
When applying as a new member state, the government can use either the name "Taiwan" or "the Republic of China." Until "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek (
Therefore, Taiwan will run into problems if it attempts to enter the UN under the name "the Republic of China."
To gain entry into the UN, Taiwan's only option is to use the name "Taiwan."
A new member state must be recommended by the Security Council and then acquire approval from two-thirds of the General Assembly to gain admission to the UN.
In addition, recommendation by the UN Security Council must be supported by nine of all 15 members, including the approval of the five permanent members.
So, if a permanent member of the Security Council vetoes the application, the Security Council recommendation will be blocked. An application for UN membership as a new member state is therefore bound to be vetoed by China, which means that an application under the name "Taiwan" is unfeasible in that arena.
Another tactic involves Resolution 2758. The 1971 resolution awarded the "China seat" to the People's Republic of China.
We could emulate the US Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which draws a distinction between the Taiwanese government and the Taiwanese people. In 1979, Washington terminated diplomatic ties with Taiwan but enacted the TRA to maintain a relationship between the people of the US and the people of Taiwan. Following this line of thinking, the UN expelled the Taiwanese government -- "Chiang's representatives" -- but not the Taiwanese people.
Thus, in 1971, the People's Republic of China gained entry to the UN. This addressed the Chinese people's right to be represented in the UN, but it created a new problem of how Taiwanese would be represented. Since the government is now requesting that the General Assembly resolve the issue, it should of course apply under the name "Taiwan."
Permitting or blocking national representation through the General Assembly is not without precedent.
And the benefit of using Resolution 2758 is that the UN General Assembly can decide on the issue of Taiwan's UN membership without requiring a recommendation from the Security Council, where China can exercise its veto.
The government must, however, use the name "Taiwan" rather than "Republic of China, Taiwan" that it is using now.
Chai Trong-rong is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS