The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) has announced it is applying for membership in the UN under the name "Republic of China (Taiwan)" this year. However, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has also discussed using the name "Taiwan" on its own. In so doing, the nation could apply for UN membership as a new member state and ask the General Assembly to re-examine UN Resolution 2758.
When applying as a new member state, the government can use either the name "Taiwan" or "the Republic of China." Until "the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek (
Therefore, Taiwan will run into problems if it attempts to enter the UN under the name "the Republic of China."
To gain entry into the UN, Taiwan's only option is to use the name "Taiwan."
A new member state must be recommended by the Security Council and then acquire approval from two-thirds of the General Assembly to gain admission to the UN.
In addition, recommendation by the UN Security Council must be supported by nine of all 15 members, including the approval of the five permanent members.
So, if a permanent member of the Security Council vetoes the application, the Security Council recommendation will be blocked. An application for UN membership as a new member state is therefore bound to be vetoed by China, which means that an application under the name "Taiwan" is unfeasible in that arena.
Another tactic involves Resolution 2758. The 1971 resolution awarded the "China seat" to the People's Republic of China.
We could emulate the US Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which draws a distinction between the Taiwanese government and the Taiwanese people. In 1979, Washington terminated diplomatic ties with Taiwan but enacted the TRA to maintain a relationship between the people of the US and the people of Taiwan. Following this line of thinking, the UN expelled the Taiwanese government -- "Chiang's representatives" -- but not the Taiwanese people.
Thus, in 1971, the People's Republic of China gained entry to the UN. This addressed the Chinese people's right to be represented in the UN, but it created a new problem of how Taiwanese would be represented. Since the government is now requesting that the General Assembly resolve the issue, it should of course apply under the name "Taiwan."
Permitting or blocking national representation through the General Assembly is not without precedent.
And the benefit of using Resolution 2758 is that the UN General Assembly can decide on the issue of Taiwan's UN membership without requiring a recommendation from the Security Council, where China can exercise its veto.
The government must, however, use the name "Taiwan" rather than "Republic of China, Taiwan" that it is using now.
Chai Trong-rong is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS