The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has applied for permission for China's Taiwan Affairs Office Director Chen Yunlin (
The KMT has accused the Mainland Affairs Council of obstructing Chen's visit, while council officials say the government has been dealing with the issue according to the law, and that it has not attempted to block Chen from visiting.
According to a report by China's state-run Xinhua news agency last Tuesday, China appealed to Taiwan to let Chen visit thus: "The mainland hoped the Taiwan authorities would permit Chen's delegation to attend the forum" on farm trade in October, Xinhua said, citing a spokesman for the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS).
China may seem eager to have its top official for Taiwan affairs come here, but ARATS is refusing to respond to correspondence on the matter from its Taiwanese counterpart, the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF).
The SEF has sent letters to China three times -- the latest was issued last Friday -- without a peep.
Reports from China have said that if ARATS responds to the SEF, it might mislead outsiders into thinking that cross-strait relations are thawing.
If China does not want cross-strait relations to thaw, then what possible purpose does Chen's visit serve other than to undermine the government and, like a Trojan horse, set up a platform for further corrosion of security?
In April, the KMT held a joint cross-strait economic and trade forum with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in Beijing, at which China offered deals including the lowering of barriers for Taiwan-grown fruit, vegetables and other farm goods, the strengthening of cross-strait financial exchanges, allowing Taiwanese to apply for licenses to practice medicine in China and encouraging Taiwan's service sector to enter the Chinese market.
If China is so eager to "normalize, regularize and stabilize cross-strait economic relations," as Chen himself was quoted as saying during the KMT-CCP forum, then why does Beijing not immediately engage in dialogue with Taipei?
Few oppose cross-strait economic exchanges and trade in principle. But no one should harbor any illusions over the grave potential for sabotage that underlies the liberalization of cross-strait ties.
If the Mainland Affairs Council approves Chen's application, then he will be the most senior Chinese official to visit Taiwan in years.
Indeed, Chen is very welcome to come here and get a taste of what his country lacks. He will be even more welcome if he expresses genuine goodwill.
Overall, however, China continues to treat Taiwan to acts of provocation. It bypasses elected officials, denies the legitimacy of the Democratic Progressive Party administration and holds the democratic mechanism in contempt by talking only with opposition parties.
If Chen's visit is going to be just another cog in the Chinese machinery of manipulation and veiled threats, then he is not welcome. If his appearance at the KMT's forum next month is going to be just another transparent attack on the national interest under the ruse of "benefiting Taiwan's farmers," then he should forget about ever coming here -- so long as this nation harbors any self-respect.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS