Young Taiwanese athletes won multiple gold medals in an impressive display at this year's International Childrens Games in Bangkok. However, at the award ceremony, the Taiwanese participants had their national flag ripped from their shoulders by Chinese officials.
Leader of the Taiwanese delegation and Taipei Deputy Mayor King Pu-tsung (
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman and Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
"This is the sixth time that Taipei has participated in this competition, while it is Beijing's first year. I am completely surprised by this rough attitude," he said.
Ma put the full responsibility on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but he limited his criticism to an objective description of China's "roughness" and stopped short of offering condemnation. Maintaining his image as "Mr Teflon," his intention is to clearly show that he doesn't take responsibility or admit fault in China's behavior.
Ma's feelings toward the CCP make us feel that his behavior is strange as well. The CCP has always been a malevolent party, which is why former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) called them bandits. How could Ma, who was vice chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council at the time of Lee's comment, not understand the CCP's true nature? The CCP has consistently sponsored violence, so is it any surprise that it snatched a few flags?
In saying that Taiwan had been participating in the games longer than China, Ma seems to think that seniority matters.
But don't forget that Lee said in 1995 that "the Republic of China has existed for 84 years. The People's Republic of China has barely existed 40 years. We are the father, they are the son."
Does the CCP acknowledge this order? Not only does it refuse to acknowledge it, but a few months afterwards it held military exercises to act out "the son beating the father." If the CCP dares to beat its elders, why would it care which country had participated in an athletic competition more often?
Ma was "completely sur-prised" by China's brutishness, but the word "completely" exposes the limits of Ma's political wisdom. Ma is completely unaware of the CCP's dictatorial nature, so it's no wonder that Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) is his idol.
Could it be that Ma thinks that his support for eventual unification would make China treat Taiwan better? To the CCP, Taiwan will forever be one of its regional administrations, the KMT will always be the CCP's child, and Ma will never be anything more than one of China's chief executives.
In the past, Ma has ordered the confiscation of Taiwanese flags at international sports competitions in Taipei because they violate Olympic convention. However, the fact that even spectators have had their Taiwanese flags confiscated demonstrates Ma's increasing willingness to pander to the CCP.
With Ma's lack of understanding of Taiwan's state affairs, it is not strange that people worry that he will be equally surprised by the possible consequences of former DPP chairman Shih Ming-teh's (
If Ma is elected president in 2008 and the CCP chooses to invade Taiwan militarily or through other deceptive means, that would probably come as a complete surprise to him as well, condemning Taiwan to eternal perdition.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taipei.
Translated by Marc Langer
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS