The next few weeks could prove to be a make or break period for Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
With former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh's (
An even sterner test of his leadership lies just around the corner when the new legislative session begins on Sept. 19 -- passage of the long delayed special arms procurement bill.
According to a recent interview with an anonymous US official, Washington has begun to have doubts about Taiwan's determination to defend itself in the event of a cross-strait war and the White House believes Taipei isn't serious about buying defensive weapons. These doubts are a result of the legislature's unwillingness to pass the arms bill.
The US official went on to say that the next two months would be crucial for the future of Taiwan's relationship with the US, saying that it could move forward, stagnate or take a step backward. If the arms bill is not passed within the first two months of the new legislative session, the official said, then the US doesn't believe it will pass at all during President Chen Shui-bian's (
The frustration caused by more than two years of delays has already forced Washington to make changes in the way it deals with arms sales to Taiwan. In future, the Pentagon will only announce sales when the budget has been passed by the Legislative Yuan. The first example of this new modus operandi is likely to be the purchase of 66 F-16 fighters, but even this proposal has already been rejected by sections of the KMT.
Only a dramatic shift in posture by the KMT legislative caucus will secure the passage of the bill, and Ma, as party chairman, is the one charged with prompting this shift.
Having visited the US in March and having met with top officials, Ma is aware of how much importance Washington places on swift passage of the bill.
Indeed, concerns about US relations and his aim of winning the presidency in 2008 are probably the rationales behind the "reasonable arms purchase" doctrine that Ma has preached over the last year.
To satisfy Taiwan's main ally and enhance his appeal to moderate voters that value close US ties, reject unification with China and would like Taiwan to maintain a defense capability, Ma needs to ensure the passage of the bill.
But maintaining the integrity of his leadership involves striking a delicate balance between deep and light-blue elements within his party and not upsetting the pro-China forces that are fiercely opposed to any arms deal and are working to undermine Ma's chairmanship.
Rumors of a watered-down arms deal passing the legislature are already circulating in the press.
If Ma manages to get an arms bill passed that is acceptable to the US, his pan-blue colleagues and the majority of Taiwanese then he will have navigated an extremely hazardous minefield.
But any failure to get a bill passed could jeopardize any US support for his candidacy, do lasting harm to his carefully cultivated domestic image and further embolden those within the pan-blue ranks who want someone else as their leader.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS