In the 20th century, while the process of democratization progressed around the world, the People's Republic of China moved in completely the opposite direction. China claims that Taiwan (including the Pescadores) are part of its territory and threatens to use force if Taiwan declares independence. The most ironic thing is that the UN supports China's assertions!
Since World War II, self-determination has received popular support around the world, and with the UN acting as a mediator, more than 100 new nations have been established. The former USSR and communist-ruled Eastern Bloc nations recognized the trend toward democracy and broke up into many independent nations. The one-party dictatorship system was also abandoned.
The colony nations in Africa and Asia, one after another, severed links with their colonial rulers and became sovereign nations.
These developments have two common points. First, many of the newly established nations had long been ruled by people of a different race. Second, the communist system fell apart. We applaud this result, because we have finally realized the intrinsic value of each individual.
What does this have to do with China's claims upon Taiwan? Let's look at history. China's Qing Dynasty ceded Taiwan to Japan after it lost the war with Japan in 1895.
Then, in 1911, Sun Yat-sen's (
Besides the changed name, the PRC also gained a new Constitution, a new national flag and new national anthem.
In light of this history, it is clear that Taiwan is not related to either the ROC or the PRC.
Should Taiwan be denied in its bid for self-determination -- which is really a formality, because Taiwan in almost all aspects is an independent country -- the nation could only be returned to the Qing Dynasty or its legal successor, but could not "revert" back to being part of the PRC, as the PRC did not exist when this nation was founded.
Furthermore, when so many former colonies have thrown off their colonial rulers, why should Taiwan instead accept a merger with the PRC when this nation has never been ruled by that government? Where is the international sense of justice and morality in this case?
Frankly speaking, any attempt to force a merger between Taiwan and China will be in vain, as the Taiwanese will never accept one-party dictatorship under the communist system that lags far behind the values and norms held by most nations around the world.
Taiwanese sources have indicated that they will submit a membership application in the name of Taiwan to the UN this month.
I sincerely request that all UN Security Council members earnestly observe the spirit of the UN Charter and do the moral thing by immediately stopping China's hegemony and granting membership to Taiwan.
Joseph Wang
Morris Plains, New Jersey
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS