In the 20th century, while the process of democratization progressed around the world, the People's Republic of China moved in completely the opposite direction. China claims that Taiwan (including the Pescadores) are part of its territory and threatens to use force if Taiwan declares independence. The most ironic thing is that the UN supports China's assertions!
Since World War II, self-determination has received popular support around the world, and with the UN acting as a mediator, more than 100 new nations have been established. The former USSR and communist-ruled Eastern Bloc nations recognized the trend toward democracy and broke up into many independent nations. The one-party dictatorship system was also abandoned.
The colony nations in Africa and Asia, one after another, severed links with their colonial rulers and became sovereign nations.
These developments have two common points. First, many of the newly established nations had long been ruled by people of a different race. Second, the communist system fell apart. We applaud this result, because we have finally realized the intrinsic value of each individual.
What does this have to do with China's claims upon Taiwan? Let's look at history. China's Qing Dynasty ceded Taiwan to Japan after it lost the war with Japan in 1895.
Then, in 1911, Sun Yat-sen's (
Besides the changed name, the PRC also gained a new Constitution, a new national flag and new national anthem.
In light of this history, it is clear that Taiwan is not related to either the ROC or the PRC.
Should Taiwan be denied in its bid for self-determination -- which is really a formality, because Taiwan in almost all aspects is an independent country -- the nation could only be returned to the Qing Dynasty or its legal successor, but could not "revert" back to being part of the PRC, as the PRC did not exist when this nation was founded.
Furthermore, when so many former colonies have thrown off their colonial rulers, why should Taiwan instead accept a merger with the PRC when this nation has never been ruled by that government? Where is the international sense of justice and morality in this case?
Frankly speaking, any attempt to force a merger between Taiwan and China will be in vain, as the Taiwanese will never accept one-party dictatorship under the communist system that lags far behind the values and norms held by most nations around the world.
Taiwanese sources have indicated that they will submit a membership application in the name of Taiwan to the UN this month.
I sincerely request that all UN Security Council members earnestly observe the spirit of the UN Charter and do the moral thing by immediately stopping China's hegemony and granting membership to Taiwan.
Joseph Wang
Morris Plains, New Jersey
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS