On Sunday, President Chen Shui-bian (
The state visits coincide with the upcoming sit-in initiated by former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-teh (
Shih's camp has urged Chen to cancel his trip and stay home to accept the protesters' demands. The pan-blue camp has slandered the president's trip, describing it as "running away."
The government has been planning the summit and state visits for more than six months. It is a pity to see all this over-politicization of domestic issues impacting on the nation's foreign affairs.
The Chen-haters' reaction to his diplomatic agenda, as well as the pan-blue camp's sabotaging of Taiwan's diplomatic efforts, are nonsense. They ignore the increasing imbalance between Taiwan and China in terms of diplomatic strength.
The timing of Chen's tour of the South Pacific is significant in a strategic way, given that Beijing bought off former ally Chad early last month. The fact that China has reached out to the world and exerted increasing influence in global affairs in recent years through frequent state visits to its allies constitutes a tremendous challenge to Taiwan's already-fragile foreign relations.
As China targets Taiwan's South Pacific allies, it is imperative that Chen increase diplomatic efforts to consolidate the nation's relationship with its diplomatic allies.
Chen's trip has two important functions. One is to correct any perception that opposition kowtowing to Beijing is representative of public opinion in this country. It is necessary for the government to launch an extensive international campaign to counter Beijing's divide-and-conquer strategy.
More importantly, Taiwan must develop a new foreign policy agenda in reaction to China's incorporation of "great nation diplomacy."
Since last year, Chinese leaders have toured South Asia, the South Pacific, the Middle East, Europe, the US and Africa. Constructive and strategic partnerships have been strengthened between China and many countries.
What can Taiwan do to counteract Beijing's growing international presence, particularly as China accelerates its activities rooting out Taiwan's allies in Africa and the South Pacific?
An increase in high-level official visits is a fundamental step in curing the regions of spreading China fever and strengthening Taiwan's diplomatic relations.
It is shameful to witness the pan-blue opposition and the Shih camp using Chen's overseas tour for domestic political ends.
Taiwan is a free and pluralist society. Demonstrations are protected by the law.
However, having the right to speak does and putting the nation at risk are different things.
In addition to maintaining a level of support from its allies, Taiwan should move beyond the narrow focus of political interests or the China factor to focus on creating long-term, stable relationships with members of the international community.
This must take place if the international community is to acknowledge the importance of Taiwan's democratic achievements and if Taiwan is to participate in the international order.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS