It is difficult for Taiwan to expect to be lauded as a nation that respects human rights when people like Lin Ting (
On Friday, Lin urged women diagnosed as HIV-positive to avoid getting pregnant. He then said that those who find themselves pregnant can seek help from the authorities in getting an abortion. He also urged doctors to encourage HIV-positive women to consider this option.
The background for his statement was that most women who have contracted AIDS in Taiwan are intravenous drug users, a large percentage of whom reside in prison, where the disease is identified via routine screening.
But what is Lin really trying to say, and what message do his words send to the rest of the world?
During his oration Lin admitted that, if treated early, a mother can be prevented from passing the disease on to her newborn child. Was Lin therefore making the announcement on behalf of the cash-strapped national insurance program to combat the cost of the expensive drugs these women would require, or was he suggesting that women who contract HIV forfeit the right to reproduce, and that drug addicts are not entitled to the same treatment as other people?
It is doubtful Lin would relay the same message to a businessman's wife who had contracted HIV from her husband after he had been philandering in China.
Whatever the reasons for Lin's announcement, this is not the kind of message that showers the authorities with glory, especially those who prattle on about Taiwan being a nation that respects human rights. These comments are the sort of thing we expect from across the Taiwan Strait, where discussion of AIDS is largely taboo, figures showing the true extent of the disease are fudged and activists who try to expose the truth are harassed and arrested.
What people with HIV/AIDS need more than anything is help: counseling so they can understand the reality of their predicament and ways that they can deal with it. They do not need a government official saying that they are inferior and telling them they must exterminate their unborn children.
Taiwan is one of the most forward-thinking nations in Asia in regard to equal opportunity, with women taking a strong role in many areas of society such as politics, business and commerce. But time and again the government has claimed to champion the cause of human rights while making little progress on important issues like human trafficking, abolishing the death penalty or improving the circumstances of disadvantaged groups like teenage mothers, HIV/AIDS sufferers and drug addicts.
With the pending abolition of the minimum wage for foreign workers, the government continues to allow foreign laborers to be treated like slaves, even after last year's Kaohsiung riots exposed the corruption, nepotism and cruelty endemic among labor brokers.
Politicians and government officials can talk about Taiwan being a human rights paradise until they are blue in the face, but until the government starts taking a more humane and committed approach to problems like HIV/AIDS and brings people like the CDC deputy director-general into line for making irresponsible comments, independent observers here and abroad will conclude that human rights in this country is a slogan as much as a reality.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS