It is difficult for Taiwan to expect to be lauded as a nation that respects human rights when people like Lin Ting (
On Friday, Lin urged women diagnosed as HIV-positive to avoid getting pregnant. He then said that those who find themselves pregnant can seek help from the authorities in getting an abortion. He also urged doctors to encourage HIV-positive women to consider this option.
The background for his statement was that most women who have contracted AIDS in Taiwan are intravenous drug users, a large percentage of whom reside in prison, where the disease is identified via routine screening.
But what is Lin really trying to say, and what message do his words send to the rest of the world?
During his oration Lin admitted that, if treated early, a mother can be prevented from passing the disease on to her newborn child. Was Lin therefore making the announcement on behalf of the cash-strapped national insurance program to combat the cost of the expensive drugs these women would require, or was he suggesting that women who contract HIV forfeit the right to reproduce, and that drug addicts are not entitled to the same treatment as other people?
It is doubtful Lin would relay the same message to a businessman's wife who had contracted HIV from her husband after he had been philandering in China.
Whatever the reasons for Lin's announcement, this is not the kind of message that showers the authorities with glory, especially those who prattle on about Taiwan being a nation that respects human rights. These comments are the sort of thing we expect from across the Taiwan Strait, where discussion of AIDS is largely taboo, figures showing the true extent of the disease are fudged and activists who try to expose the truth are harassed and arrested.
What people with HIV/AIDS need more than anything is help: counseling so they can understand the reality of their predicament and ways that they can deal with it. They do not need a government official saying that they are inferior and telling them they must exterminate their unborn children.
Taiwan is one of the most forward-thinking nations in Asia in regard to equal opportunity, with women taking a strong role in many areas of society such as politics, business and commerce. But time and again the government has claimed to champion the cause of human rights while making little progress on important issues like human trafficking, abolishing the death penalty or improving the circumstances of disadvantaged groups like teenage mothers, HIV/AIDS sufferers and drug addicts.
With the pending abolition of the minimum wage for foreign workers, the government continues to allow foreign laborers to be treated like slaves, even after last year's Kaohsiung riots exposed the corruption, nepotism and cruelty endemic among labor brokers.
Politicians and government officials can talk about Taiwan being a human rights paradise until they are blue in the face, but until the government starts taking a more humane and committed approach to problems like HIV/AIDS and brings people like the CDC deputy director-general into line for making irresponsible comments, independent observers here and abroad will conclude that human rights in this country is a slogan as much as a reality.
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
In the weeks following the 2024 US presidential election, I have received one question more than any other from friends in Taiwan — how will Donald J. Trump’s return to the White House affect Taiwan and cross-Strait relations? Some Taiwan counterparts have argued that Trump hates China, so therefore he will support Taiwan, according to the logic that the enemy of one’s enemy is a friend. Others have expressed anxiety that Trump will put pressure on Taiwan to dramatically increase defense spending, or to compensate the United States for allegedly “stealing” America’s semiconductor sector. While I understand these hopes and concerns, I
RSS