I read with interest the recent article ("Blowing in the wind," Aug. 20, page 17) setting out the future development of wind power in Taiwan. Many of the issues raised were similar to those we have faced in the UK, where we recently published an Energy Review with the aim of tackling both climate change and energy security.
These are equally, if not more important for Taiwan, given its lack of local energy resources and the indiscriminate nature of the impact of climate change. The review set out a number of conclusions and the need for a number of parallel approaches, tackling both electricity generation and energy efficiency.
The UK government has set a target of 10 percent of electricity being generated from renewable sources by 2010, up from the 4 percent at present. This would make the UK one of Europe's leading generators of renewable energy. This target is an integral part of the UK government's aim of reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 60 percent by 2050.
As noted in your article, administrative uncertainty is a significant barrier to further progress. In the UK, planning regulations are being reviewed to reduce the delays and uncertainties that energy projects face. Cost issues also exist but carbon-pricing mechanisms have helped to make renewable energy sources more economically attractive. Such mechanisms help to ensure that targets on greenhouse gas emissions are met in the most efficient, lowest-cost manner.
Along with Taiwan's Bureau of Energy, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Industrial Technology Research Institute, we are holding a Renewable Energy Seminar on Nov. 30. This is a good opportunity for both Taiwan and the UK to exchange views and discuss how we can co-operate on the forthcoming projects in Taiwan.
I encourage Taiwan to continue to pursue its goals on renewable energy sources. This will require commitment and innovation from both central and local governments. It will also require the support of legislators and the general public. Awareness of the need to tackle climate change grows everyday; governments need to work together with industry and the public to identify win-win ways of tackling these important issues.
Michael Reilly,
Director-General, British Trade and Culture Office
Taipei
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS