Taiwan's opposition parties and interest groups are continuing to call on President Chen Shui-bian (
The pan-blue camp, for example, has spread rumors that the president's son-in-law, Chao Chien-ming (
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Wang Shih-cheng (
DPP Legislator Wang Hsing-nan (
The headquarters for Shih's campaign to oust the president, on the other hand, has released information about death threats against Shih and asked for police protection. There have also been clashes between Chen's supporters and opponents in his home town in Tainan County.
The attacks have now extended to the personal morals of Chen, Shih and people close to them, as well as unification and independence supporters alike. This is creating an atmosphere of insecurity that will do no one any good.
Shih's cause to unseat the president through instigating a popular uprising is wrong-headed. Taiwan is a democracy that has clear legal requirements and procedures regulating the removal of a president.
The pan-blue camp's legislative recall motion failed and Chen retains the legal right to govern. Organizing street protests is not a good tactic, because if the president is forced to step down as a result, it will set a bad precedent for this nation's democracy.
The office of the president would become so easily swayed by political conflict that future presidents would eventually come under the same pressure. That would set Taiwan off on the same vicious political cycle seen in the Philippines, South Korea, Thailand and Indonesia.
Nonetheless, Shih and others opposed to Chen have a legal right to air their opinions as well as a limited degree of freedom to assemble. As long as they do not violate the law, these rights must be respected and protected.
The president's supporters may disapprove of Shih's proposition, but they should not physically attack him or threaten him. By the same token, the anti-Chen forces may protest, but the protests must not turn into riots resembling the debacle that followed the 2004 presidential election. Nor must those opposing Chen cook up unfounded charges or threaten him or his family's security.
Both sides grappling with this issue have strong arguments and public support, and neither side can easily defeat the other. The goal of adhering to democratic values and the rule of law should be placed above and beyond the issue of protecting or unseating the president.
If the nation can resolve this conflict in a civilized and rational manner, it will remain a democracy worthy of emulation. The alternative is a throwback to the days when political violence was par for the course.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS