China's GDP grew by 10.9 percent in the first half of this year and by 11.3 percent in the second quarter. These figures stunned analysts.
A catch phrase in China says that "numbers make cadres and cadres make up numbers." That is, impressive numbers can promote a party cadre, who can then use his or her power to make up desirable numbers. This interaction between cadres and numbers goes on today: The GDP figures reported by local governments do not match the national GDP.
Even more frightening is fixed asset investment. Generally speaking, 25 percent growth in fixed asset investment is adequate to sustain normal economic development. However, China's grew by 31.3 percent in the first half of this year, pointing to an overheated economy.
Yi Xianrong (
Back when the government was trying to push economic growth to 7-8 percent per annum, officials at every level exaggerated figures to ensure promotion. Once the economy took off, local government officials worried that the central government's macroeconomic controls would hurt their economic interests and so reduced the figures they reported.
The regular approach to managing an overheated economy is to rely on monetary policy and raise interest rates. However, China is facing a unique situation. Over the past two years, officials have warned that the economy is overheated. In April, China's central bank raised its one-year lending rate by 0.27 percentage points for the first time in 18 months. The government's decision to raise only the lending interest rate was aimed at maintaining the policy of stimulating domestic demand.
Why have the authorities kept their foot on the gas? First, many state-run enterprises subsist on bank loans. Increasing interest rates will only make things more difficult for them by increasing bad debt and in turn creating problems for the whole nation.
Second, only rapid economic development and massive investment enables corrupt officials to ply their trade, particularly those officials who approve loans.
In the end, the government can do nothing about its overheated economy but let it continue until the bubble bursts. Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao's (
For the first half of this year, investment in real estate development accounted for 18.2 percent of overall fixed asset investment. If Beijing fails to cool down the overheated real estate sector, it will also be difficult to cool down the overheated economy. Real estate markets, however, are booming at the local government level, making it easy for corrupt officials to make huge profits.
Repeated adjusting of macroeconomic policies means less profit, and therefore foreign investors are made to suffer instead -- as demonstrated by Beijing's decision to impose restrictions on foreign investment in the real estate sector.
If China continues to refrain from political reform and is unable to solve longstanding economic problems, the economy will one day implode. If that happens, foreign investors will become scapegoats or be forced to help Beijing weather its difficulties. This will apply in particular to those who are now leading the drive to invest in China's state-run enterprises.
Paul Lin is a political commentator. Translated by Daniel Cheng
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS