The Taipei City Government has granted permission to former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-teh (
The decision has provoked anger and skepticism because the Taipei City Government has never before allowed rallies of this nature to extend beyond a late evening deadline.
Attacks on this special treatment for Shih, of course, will not hurt Shih's rally in garnering more media attention.
Of more interest is whether the campaign can attract support from the wider community of pan-green supporters and civic groups. If the purpose of Shih's rally is to convince Chen to step down of his own accord, rather than provide a stage for Shih as a comeback politician, then the last thing that Shih would want is to have his rally too closely associated with the pan-blue camp.
Most pan-green supporters are disappointed with Chen, and among these are some voices calling for him to step down. However, because of the long history of antagonism between the pan-green and pan-blue camps, pan-green supporters tend to back down or at least hold great reservations about giving support to causes if they are deemed to be "pan-blue" activities.
Shih's rally does seem to be gathering a level of support from the general public. But the question is: who exactly? If the bulk of support comes from supporters of the pan-blue camp, then this is hardly constructive in terms of making Chen step down. The reason that Chen is able to continue his presidency is that most in the pan-green camp do not support his resignation or removal.
However, in view of the treatment granted to Shih by the Taipei City Government -- interpretable as special treatment from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman and Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Making the situation more complicated for Shih and Ma is criticism from within the pan-blue camp, and the People First Party (PFP) in particular. The PFP pointed out that two years ago Ma ordered Taipei police to disperse an anti-Chen rally led by then KMT chairman Lien Chan (
Hoping to make hay out of all of this, the Taiwan Solidarity Union's Taipei mayoral candidate, Clara Chou (
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS