The severing of diplomatic ties with Chad is neither an isolated nor a purely diplomatic issue. Even after the nation made such a large investment in diplomatic resources, Chad still decided to focus on short-term interests and threw in its lot with China, following the law of the international jungle. Given China's growing power and political influence, there is a risk that this decision will be the beginning of a negative trend.
Taiwan's response to this severe challenge should therefore not be the responsibility of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs alone. A consensual change in understanding and a new approach is required among government officials, diplomats and society at large to avoid being trapped in the cut-throat game of cross-strait diplomacy.
First, a distinction must be made between the diplomacy of recognition and practical diplomacy. The first involves working toward recognition by the international community and international organizations, while practical diplomacy revolves around protecting national interests and promoting social exchange.
At present, Taiwan may be the only state in the world to have problems garnering recognition of its existence despite the universally known fact that it is an independent, free and constitutional democracy and despite almost every country in the world maintaining practical diplomatic relations with Taipei.
This makes the country a member of the international club of nations, and other states also treat it as an important member of that club. They interact with Taiwan on the basis of that recognition, but at official club meetings, Taiwan cannot be officially mentioned.
In other words, Taiwan is already part of the international community but is still trying to find its way to the ticket office. The diplomacy of recognition may be necessary, but it is practical diplomacy that guarantees Taiwan's international interests and international participation.
Second, we should start thinking about how to put an end to diplomatic hostilities with China. Cross-strait relations and diplomatic relations are two sides of the same coin, and the relationship between the two is very clear. China's isolation of Taiwan is intimately linked to its focus on the "one China" policy -- in the past the goal was to promote unification, but now it is to prevent Taiwanese independence.
The unavoidable challenge for Taiwan is therefore to find ways to use the cross-strait relationship and its China policy to make Beijing agree to a diplomatic ceasefire.
Of course, cross-strait relations and diplomatic relations do not counterbalance each other, nor can we choose one or the other. The cross-strait relationship will not remain frozen forever and Taiwan's number of diplomatic allies must not fall into the single digits, so finding a balance between the two is a big challenge.
There is no coordination between China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and its agency for relations across the Taiwan Strait, which is why Chad severed its diplomatic ties with Taiwan not long before China's Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Chen Yunlin (
Clearly, cross-strait and diplomatic relations must be coordinated based on overall strategy and policy considerations. A diplomatic ceasefire or a tacit agreement could be achieved by engaging in direct dialogue with Beijing or Washington.
Third, we mustbe closely engaged with the current trend toward the globalization and democratization of international affairs, and engage in comprehensive and meaningful diplomatic activities. No matter what kind of diplomatic activity the country engages in -- be it humanitarian, non-governmental, academic, environmental, human rights or trade diplomacy -- it should be carried out through direct international participation and multi-lateral exchanges, to help widen Taiwan's international ties.
An excessive emphasis on diplomatic recognition has made the country ignore its responsibilities and obligations in the international community. This has resulted in Taiwan concentrating its diplomatic resources on keeping the number of diplomatic allies high, thereby creating a situation where the allies raise unreasonable demands.
Taiwan expends much less of its resources on international participation and diplomacy than other nations. International aid and humanitarian and human rights assistance are all areas where efforts can be stepped up.
Philip Yang is a professor in the department of political science at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Perry Svensson and Lin Ya-ti
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS