At one time, Shih Ming-teh(
At the trials following the Kaohsiung Incident in March 1980 he made a brilliant argument that Taiwan had already been independent for 30 years. President Chen Shui-bian (
In 1992 Shih lost the election for the chairmanship of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to Hsu Hsin-liang (
Elected in 1994, and then allied with the New Tide faction, Nori made some effort to reform the DPP, but without success.
In my view, after that Shih began to lose the idealism and clarity of purpose that had marked his earlier words and actions. His "coffee meeting" to make a deal with New Party in late 1995 was widely criticized as failing the cause of Taiwan independence, and in his defensive reaction he began to hobnob with former enemies, defenders of martial law such as now People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
In my opinion, despite his earlier steadfastness as a political prisoner, or perhaps because of it, Shih's lifestyle and habits did not prepare him for the daily grind of administration as a legislator and party chairman. A loner and a night-owl, he could not manage to keep office hours, or communicate effectively with his staff. Their dedication was mostly wasted. He was easily flattered by reporters and hangers-on, and addicted to women, alcohol and cigarettes.
I think it was these flaws of character that led Shih to seek the limelight with statements that were striking but badly coordinated with the rest of the DPP. Lawyers such as Chen were used to writing documents, hard work, early hours and teamwork and the lawyers soon upstaged Shih.
His bid for a legislative seat in Taipei in 2001 was unsuccessful -- and had been organized by Hsu's Rising Peoples' Foundation, whose founding was largely attended by liberal KMT figures. Shih did not support Chen's drive for the presidency in 2000. Among others, he gave a talk at Shih Hsin University sponsored by a New Party figure, and after presenting his philosophy of how he survived as a prisoner, he ended with pot shots at Chen.
According to Lin Chung-mo (
This is a brief glimpse of how I think Shih has come to play the role he has taken up now; people are continually asking me this. There has been a clear pattern of the KMT using former DPP figures to attack the DPP; and the KMT, formerly the richest political party in the world, has the resources to make this ploy attractive.
By now many years have passed, and although Shih announced last year that he was withdrawing from politics, he has now announced a campaign to unseat Chen, including the threat of extra-legal actions. Are we really to believe that Nori is doing this out of concern for the DPP and the highest of ideals?
For the last six years at least his activities and announcements have seemed mysteriously coordinated with the interests of the pan-blue camp, and even its extremes in the People First Party.
PFP members, I have been told, urged him to run for mayor of Kaohsiung, and provided the funding.
If he is so concerned about corruption, why hasn't he spoken out in the past on Soong's Chung Hsin Bills case, or the issue of KMT party property? Or the Lafayette case?
If Shih is to set himself up as the center of a crusade against corruption, then I think it is fair to ask him to make public his own finances for the last several years, and to face squarely whether he has any financial links to the KMT, which has been trying to bring down the DPP government from the very start for a variety of pretexts, the first being the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant.
Corruption has been long ingrained in Taiwan society, down to the lowest levels, and the change of ruling parties has only begun to alter the rules. We cannot defend the DPP in general or the president in particular in so far as they have taken the easier route of continuing past habits, trying to buy off the obstacles, and perhaps even lining their own pockets with unearned rewards.
But his campaigning for Chen to step down now, without use of the present mechanisms of impeachment or recall, any advance toward democracy and the rule of law? Does it test or improve the present legal system? Or would it be a step back to the KMT's former easy appropriation of state resources and assets, which we can assume will rebound again with vengeance if KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) becomes president?
So why has Shih got involved in politics again? It seems anachronistic for him to raise the specter of revolution, when now finally the citizens can exercise their right to vote. Does he have a long-term vision of what he wants? Does he still stand for Taiwan's emergence as an internationally recognized nation? Or has he abandoned the ideals that he sacrificed 25 years of his life for, too?
Linda Gail Arrigo is the international officer for the Green Party Taiwan.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS