On the eve of Premier Su Tseng-chang's (蘇貞昌) visit to Chad, the African nation broke off diplomatic relations with Taiwan. Behind this was the black hand of China. This episode makes it clear that despite Su's revision of President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁 ) policies, China still isn't satisfied, as what it really want is someone to completely sell out the nation the way former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (連戰) did last year.
Judging by China's foreign relations in recent years, it hasn't just been trying to cope with the "Taiwan issue" -- its overall policy has been to broaden and entrench an international anti-US front.
While everyone was focused on North Korea's missile launch and its connection with China, foreign Chinese-language media and South Korean media have been helping Beijing by trying to put some distance between China and North Korea. One Hong Kong media outlet had a special report claiming that there was a deep rift between China and North Korea, and that the two have different intentions. Is this really the case?
The report said that China was not given forewarning of the North Korean missile launch. This is what China itself says. The Chinese Communist Party has been lying since its founding, and anyone who believes it in this particular case has been duped. As for North Korean leader Kim Jong-il's refusal to meet with a representative from China, this is clearly an act put on for the US.
The Hong Kong report also said that China proposed sanctions against North Korea in the UN. This just wrong. China was opposed to sanctions, and only made a verbal condemnation that lacked any binding commitment. It says that North Korea may have the ability to print counterfeit Chinese money, but as of yet there is no evidence that the regime has done so.
Yet when counterfeit US money was found in Macau more than 10 years ago, the Yazhou Zhoukan weekly magazine reported that China had prevented the Macau government from making a thorough investigation.
The magazine report went on to say that the Bank of China had agreed to US requests to freeze North Korean accounts in its Macau branches. This was supposed to have happened last year, but no one is sure if it has or not. However, China has allowed North Korea to relocate its Macau office to the city of Zhuhai in Guangdong Province. Since Macau's international casinos make it a suitable place for the CIA to operate, moving to Guangdong put the North Koreans under direct Chinese protection.
If there really has been a rift in the relationship between China and North Korea, why doesn't China simply expel the North Koreans? Furthermore, even though China may have frozen North Korean accounts, China's President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) visited North Korea last November to give US$2 billion in aid. In a word, China is still opposing the US and supporting Kim's regime.
When China, Russia and four other former Soviet states established the Shanghai Co-operation Organization (SCO) in June 2001, it was intended to be a check on US influence. After years of work, it had a major breakthrough in June. Not only did it invite Mongolia, Pakistan and India to attend as observers -- the heads of state attended from all countries except India -- but it also invited the US' sworn enemy, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who is believed to be developing nuclear weapons, has advocated that Israel be wiped off the face of the map and has helped stir up the conflict in Lebanon.
Ahmadinejad was the focus of media attention in Shanghai, and now the SCO is seen as an Asian Warsaw Pact. Following the collapse of the eastern European Warsaw Pact, China has gathered together former communist countries and terrorists to oppose Western democracies headed by the US, the most prominent democracy.
US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Christopher Hill testified to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the Iranian government dispatched at least one person to North Korea to observe the missile launch. It is evident that this Asian Warsaw Pact extends from the Middle East to East Asia, linking Iran with North Korea.
This group has a broader spectrum of participants than the the socialist members of the original Warsaw Pact, and poses a more serious anti-US nuclear threat. Under these conditions, how can the US please the communist party by short-sightedly encouraging Taiwan to accept China's "united front" strategy disguised as an exchange?
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taipei.
Translated by Marc Langer
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS