Former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-Teh (
Shih's activities have symbolic significance due to his historical ties with the DPP, but are unlikely to enjoy much success. The truth of the matter is the worst moment for Chen has passed. In the absence of any new and dramatic revelation, Chen is widely expected to finish the remainder of his term. No amount of open or "back room" condemnation by Shih or any other former DPP bigwig -- such as Hsu Hsin-liang (許信良) -- is likely to accomplish anything much.
It cannot be denied that Shih and Hsu played an important role in the dissident movement of the Martial Law era and in the nation's democratization process. Their ties with the DPP run deep -- the fact that they both served as DPP chairman pretty much speaks for itself.
However, during the past few years, they have gone out of their way to criticize or rubbish the DPP. When they periodically resurface to make news, it has typically been to promote some agenda in which they side with the pan-blues. Hsu's speech at the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) headquarters last week during a celebration for the one-year anniversary of Ma Ying-jeou's (
Perhaps Shih and Hsu genuinely feel that they have risen above the petty inter-party bickering that constitutes contemporary Taiwanese politics, and are simply taking on an impartial role as "fatherly" advisor or critic. Unfortunately, there is little room in the nation's politics for so-called "moderates" or impartial figures.
In today's Taiwan, the world is clearly divided between blue and green, and never the twain shall meet. In particular, for figures with a strong affiliation or background in one camp, almost the only alternative to strong party identification is to swing rapidly and sharply to the opposite side. The voters on the other side will embrace you, because you are living proof that their enemies (that is, your old comrades) were wrong. There is no turning back, however, because your old friends will consider, rightly, that you have betrayed them. And this is the situation with Shih and Hsu.
Under the circumstances, Shih and Hsu have virtually no influence in the DPP and among pan-green voters in general. When they speak out against the DPP government and Chen, those who are "moved" or "inspired" are not pan-green supporters but pan-blue supporters. In fact, every time they speak, traditional pan-green supporters are enraged, as they feel that the pan-blue camp is deliberately using Shih and Hsu to insult them. Under the circumstances, the fact that Ma has already indicated that his party will support Shih's campaign will only further alienate pan-green voters from the campaign.
At the same time as Shih launched his campaign, there has been a lot of speculation about the attitude of former president Lee Teng-hui (
Faced with the possible intervention of Lee and Lin in the campaign to unseat the president, Shih's noise is the least of Chen's worries.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS