The gathering of Asians and Americans, all experienced in dealing with trans-Pacific issues, quickly zeroed in on a basic obstacle to better relations between nations of this region. At an East-West Center seminar in Hawaii, Americans and Asians alike pointed to Washington.
"The atmosphere in Washington is the worst in the memory of anyone now alive," said James Kelly, who as an assistant secretary of state headed the East Asia division of that department during President George W. Bush's first term.
"The inattention to Asia is unfortunate but probably natural," Kelly said, referring to the demands of the war in Iraq, the conflagration between Israel and Hezbollah terrorists and attempts to contain the nuclear ambitions of Iran.
"There is an insufficient realization that Asia has become the center of gravity," he said, meaning the focal point of political, economic and military power with which the US must cope.
"Policy and strategy toward East Asia," he said, "are not easy to discern."
Stephen Bosworth, a former US ambassador to the Philippines and South Korea, chimed in.
"The administration can't deal with more than one or two issues at a time," he said. "There just isn't enough time in a day or enough energy."
Bosworth, now dean of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University near Boston, added: "The inattention of Washington may not be reversible in a couple of years because it is so absorbed with Iraq, Iran and the Middle East."
Instead, he thought the US would be in a holding pattern until 2009, when a new president will take office after the election of November 2008.
Meantime, Bosworth said, the foundations of power in Asia "will have shifted while we were not paying attention. By 2009, the context will have shifted."
Kelly took that thought a step further: "Even in 2009, we don't know if the US will take a better direction."
A Chinese perspective came from Jin Canrong (金燦榮) of the People's University of China, who said his government had "rather low" expectations of the remaining years of the Bush administration.
"There is nothing we really want from Sino-US relations," he said.
Similarly, the press secretary of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, Shaukat Sultan Khan, said: "One cannot expect miracles in the last two years" of Bush's term of office.
He expressed concern that Bush would use force to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear arms, a conflict that would spill into Pakistan.
A senior member of Vietnam's National Assembly, Ton Nu Thi Ninh, applauded veterans of both the US and Vietnam for leading a reconciliation between her nation and the US.
Even so, she said, "Vietnam is low in US priorities; Vietnam has no illusions about that."
To encourage candor, none of the 34 political leaders, government officials, diplomats, military officers, academics, think tank people, business executives or journalists at the seminar could normally be quoted. Kelly, whose home is in Honolulu, and Bosworth, however, gave permission to be quoted. Jin, Khan and Ninh spoke at a public luncheon later.
A Southeast Asian participant suggested there was an exception to Washington's inattention to Asia, which was "an obsession with China" that reduced Washington's consideration of other issues to how they would affect relations with China.
Kelly and Bosworth agreed.
"China is a potential new hegemon in Asia. Its economy and dynamic diplomacy affect all in the region. But there is a willingness to have the US play a role there. We are not being forced out," Kelly said.
A military officer said the US Pacific Command sought to expand its engagement with the People's Liberation Army to work out agreements that would prescribe the behavior of US and Chinese forces when close to one another.
The US and Russia have such an agreement intended to prevent hostile incidents at sea, but the Chinese have resisted that approach.
Several Asian participants urged the US to engage the public in Asian democracies.
One national legislator said: "The US should look at the publics of other democracies as if they were your own constituents. If you do, you might be able to overcome the anti-American feelings in some nations."
In the end, however, Kelly was not optimistic about the administration's interest in forging a fresh policy toward Asia.
"Asia is not waiting for word from Washington," he said, "but is moving ahead."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS