Does Taiwan support terrorism?
According to some commentators, the meeting between Minister of Foreign Affairs James Huang (
This insinuation is patently absurd.
Taiwan is no rogue state, like North Korea, Syria or Iran. In fact, Taiwan is a more dutiful member of the international community -- which it is technically not even a part of -- than many countries that enjoy good standing at the UN.
Take China, for instance. China has played a key role in helping Iran develop its nuclear program. Ditto for Russia and Pakistan.
Unlike these countries, Taiwan plays by the rules when it comes to international commitments on the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
Taiwan has a very advanced arms industry that is capable of producing ballistic and cruise missiles. Since Taiwan is ignored by the international community -- which goes to great lengths to keep this country's enemy placated -- why doesn't Taipei take advantage of its "non-state" status and make some quick cash?
The answer is best summed up in this way: Taipei doesn't emulate Pyongyang because Taiwan is a free, democratic state whose citizens believe in the rule of law. Taiwan even obeys treaties it isn't allowed to sign because of its status, such as the Kyoto accord.
Taiwan also plays an important and oft-ignored role in international law enforcement efforts to track and thwart illicit activity, including terrorism.
Taiwan is a major transshipment point for goods of all kinds, with three of the busiest ports in Asia. US Customs even has a team of officers permanently based in Kaohsiung, the nation's largest port. Taiwanese intelligence and law enforcement officials regularly cooperate with regional and international partners.
This seems all very nice for an international pariah.
Taiwan's diplomacy is like the cliche about whether or not a tree makes a sound when it falls in the forest: "If the Ministry of Foreign Affairs does something, does anybody care?"
Well, for most people, the answer is usually "No." The first time that most Taiwanese hear the name of one of their diplomatic allies is when it severs ties in favor of China. And the only time people hear about Taiwan internationally is when Beijing threatens to invade it.
So it is easy to mock the efforts of the nation's diplomats, and the opposition parties in particular have been using foreign relations as a stick with which to beat the administration.
But one must ask the question: If the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) were running things, would Taiwan's diplomatic obstacles suddenly disappear? Not likely. The country would certainly still be down to 24 official allies, as it is now.
What has motivated countries to bow to China's pressure has little to do with Taiwan's domestic politics or the policies of President Chen Shui-bian (
The real problem is that the world cares little about the fate of this wonderful democracy, which has a bigger population and economy than many European states.
Perhaps this is purely out of ignorance. One hopes that when, for example, New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark flatly refuses to support Taiwan's efforts to join the WHO, it isn't because she is unaware of Taiwan's contribution to the world.
But when people justify such actions as "be[ing] inconsistent with the `one China' policy which most nations ... adhere to," one begins to wonder how much reality intrudes on international perceptions.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS