Taiwan's democracy and identity are serious topics that touch on the nation's very existence.
Two recent events have caught the attention of the Taiwanese public. First, the premiere of a documentary entitled Taiwan's Road to Democracy caused a sensation among the nation's pro-localization forces. The second event was the second signature drive by a group of pan-green academics, which focused on democracy and identity in an attempt to review the govern-ment's performance and the maturity of Taiwan's civil society.
Both events dealt with the same subject matter from different perspectives. The documentary praises the nation's democratic achievements between 1988 and 2000, claiming that Taiwan has won international acclaim for transforming itself from an authoritarian society into a democracy through a peaceful revolution. It also reminds the Taiwanese to defy hardship and danger and launch the next stage of democratization.
The signature drive launched by the pro-green academics highlighted their frustration and disappointment with the stalled process of democratization that has resulted from the country's identity crisis, and asked the public to consider how to enrich Taiwan's national identity through democratic values.
The documentary reflects every crucial event and turning point in the nation's pursuit of democracy and how, for every step toward democracy, Taiwan has further clarified its relationship with China. It also shows how this has led to a clearer understanding of what Taiwan is and who we are, and how democratization had led to localization and the formation of a Taiwanese identity.
This culminated in former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) proposal of a "special state-to-state" formula to define cross-strait relations and the transfer of power to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in 2000.
However, following the DPP's ascent to power, the nation's democracy has been dealt a series of blows as a result of the conflict between the pan-green and pan-blue camps. The opposition-dominated legislature has rendered ineffective the popularly elected government's attempt to implement policy, while Taiwanese identity has been eroded as a result of the economic attraction of China, the influence of Taiwan's China-leaning politicians and parties and a wavering government.
Taiwan has temporarily lost its confidence and a sense of direction to guide its future development. When contemplating a solution, the government should set the agenda it intends to follow in the next stage of democratization and kick-start that stage to focus and strengthen national awareness among the public.
During the first stage of democratization, a conference on national affairs was convened, the "Communist rebellion" era was ended, the Constitution was reinstated and lifetime employment for legislators and National Assembly members was ended. The Constitution has been amended six times. We now have full legislative and direct presidential elections. Over the past 12 years, every move that Taiwan has made has been intended to help the nation grow stronger and become a normal country.
For Taiwanese identity to be further deepened, the Taiwanese people must have confidence. The question of how the government should go about enhancing the nation's performance on the political, economic and cultural fronts in order to build confidence among the Taiwanese thus becomes crucial to building national identity.
There is no denying that China's rapid cultural and economic rise on the international stage in recent years has led to a growing sense of inferiority and China-leaning attitudes among the Taiwanese public. According to a survey conducted by the Chinese-language magazine Global Views Monthly, China, trailing only Japan and the US, is the country that Taiwanese admire the most.
In this survey, South Korea, one of the four Asian tigers, is ranked fourth. With their tremendous confidence in their country, the South Koreans have fared better than Taiwan on the economic and cultural fronts.
The most urgent task the government is facing in its policy implementation now is building confidence among the public and making them proud to be Taiwanese.
Margot Chen is a research fellow at Taiwan Advocates, a think tank initiated by former president Lee Teng-hui.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS