A number of signs have arisen from the Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development that took place on July 27 and 28. These signs highlighted the ongoing loss of national identity in Taiwan today. At a symposium of the conference's cross-strait task force, a representative of China-based Taiwanese businesspeople slammed the government, and referred to Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) as "Comrade Hu Jintao."
Although he, in embarrassment, corrected his slip of the tongue, the episode highlights that China-based Taiwanese businesspeople have accepted and integrated China's political dogma into their lives and thinking. The longer they live in China, the more assimilated they become. This is just human nature and there is nothing strange about it.
The problem is that there is a huge difference in population, territory, and political power between Taiwan and China. China therefore normally holds the upper hand in the process of cross-strait integration, while China-based Taiwanese businesspeople are just a disadvantaged group being subjugated by China.
China, of course, has made good use of this advantage. Several years ago, it systematically organized Taiwanese businesspeople and helped them establish associations in various Chinese cities. This lies at the very heart of China's strategy to apply political pressure through business to help achieve its goal of unification.
The phrase "Comrade Hu Jintao" that was unintentionally repeated in Taipei is a standard expression among Taiwanese businesspeople in China. As long as the government continues to push for opening up toward China, it won't be many years before the phrase is no longer considered a slip-up in Taiwan, but rather becomes necessary for Taiwanese businesspeople when expressing their loyalty to Beijing.
During the Period of Communist Rebellion, investing in China was equated with funding the enemy and was punishable by death, but just a dozen or so years later, everything has changed. Today, these Taiwanese businesspeople can come back to Taiwan to participate in the Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development, and ask in public, "Who doesn't love Taiwan?"
This national identity crisis also appeared in another meeting related to the Conference on Sustaining Taiwan's Economic Development. In order to placate Chinese tourists who visit Taiwan, the National Association of Travel Agents requested that the government accept the yuan as "semi-official national currency" and allow free New Taiwan dollar-Chinese yuan exchanges.
Later, the association said that the request was simply a typo, but that does not sound very persuasive. In fact, this was not the first time Taiwan's tourist industry has trampled on national dignity.
Last year, 4.1 million Taiwanese tourists visited China, but the Taiwanese flag never flew at the hotels where they stayed. A few days ago, however, TV reports showed Chinese tourists cruising on Sun Moon Lake (
But there are a thousand ways to promote one's business, and there is no need for Taiwanese to attract business by belittling themselves as if they were Chinese slaves. Now that we've seen Chinese flags flying on Taiwan's soil, it is not surprising to hear talk of the yuan becoming semi-official national currency.
The only difference is that the former is simply a matter of commercial hype, while the latter involves damaging national identity. The idea of treating the yuan as semi-official national currency is no different from endorsing the belief that China is an ally or even our motherland.
Of course, we can regard this thinking as a "temporary delusion," but this could well be the beginning of a permanent delusion. If it gets worse, it could be the prelude to the nation's ruin.
Will Taiwan perish? Don't underestimate the severity of the deeper crisis that lies behind the thinking that would request the yuan be considered a semi-official national currency, or the choice of a phrase like "Comrade Hu Jintao." If the government doesn't change its policies of "active opening," "effective opening," or "confident opening," the confusion regarding national identity will deepen as cross-strait economic integration continues.
When the delusion that China is our motherland becomes normal, and the normalcy -- that Taiwan is the motherland -- is regarded as delusion, that will be when Taiwan perishes.
Don't discard this warning as nonsense or simply trying to raise a fuss. The crisis is near at hand.
Take this conference as an example: While it should discuss sustainable economic development for Taiwan and while Taiwan's dependence on China is already unbelievably high -- 71 percent of Taiwan's foreign investment goes there, accumulated Taiwanese investment in China has reached US$300 billion, and the production value of Taiwanese businesses in China last year equaled Taiwan's GDP -- the cross-strait task force only discussed how to further open up Taiwan to China.
If the government's lack of understanding of the facts is not an example of confusion, then what is?
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS