The phrase "rat running across the street" (
Chen obviously has more than his share of faults and really has no one to blame for all this but himself. However, it has got to the point that so many people want to jump onto the bandwagon to bring him down that there just isn't enough sensational dirt to go around. After unsuccessful attempts to raise public interest in their crusade, the anti-Chen accusers are becoming more and more frivolous -- the latest and perhaps most absurd accusation forcing an investigation into the receipts used to claim reimbursement from a Presidential Office expense fund.
No one doubts that it is wrong both legally and ethically to be reimbursed for an expense that one doesn't incur or to which one is not entitled. However, if you seek to take the high moral ground, there is no stopping your enemy from trying to outbid you and demanding even higher standards. The truth of the matter is that the practice of getting cash reimbursements with forged receipts is so common in Taiwan -- especially among members of the Legislative Yuan -- that whoever hurled the first stone against Chen for irregularities in receipt reimbursements has inadvertently given his enemies a lot of ammunition.
Therefore, it was not surprising that almost immediately after the probe into the "receipt scandal" began, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers began to question Taipei Mayor and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
This is not to mention that the so-called "irregularity" associated with expense reimbursements in the Presidential Office derives from a lack of details in the receipts submitted. The Presidential Office has claimed that the details of the spending cannot be disclosed on confidentiality grounds. It is not going to be easy to refute that argument. While the general public demands a lot more transparency from the Presidential Office and often places it under close scrutiny for highly justified reasons, it has to be admitted that some degree of confidentiality is necessary for at least some spending. At the very least, a gray area exists regarding what kind and level of disclosure should be expected from the Presidential Office.
One question that the general public -- and surely the DPP -- is likely to ask is why didn't the Ministry of Audit catch this mistake or irregularity in the past? According to the Presidential Office, its practice was no different in previous years and no one ever said a thing. Does that mean the Ministry of Audit has not faithfully fulfilled its duties in the past, both during Chen's presidency and the reign of his predecessors?
In the weeks to come, it can be expected that this morality campaign is likely to reach new heights. DPP lawmakers have already condemned Ma for the impropriety of some KMT lawmakers in drinking at a hostess club in China. We can safely assume that Taiwan's "moral majority" can see through all this.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS