Rumors have surfaced of a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) plot to "destroy" People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
KMT and PFP insiders have not denied these rumors -- a clear indication of the flimsy nature of the pan-blue coalition, which has never been able to rise above the struggle for political benefit and election rivalry. Even if the Taipei mayoral election does not lead to the disintegration of the pan-blue camp, the impact of the new single-member district system to be adopted in the next legislative elections certainly will.
Soong is an experienced and cunning politician with broad campaign experience, having stood for the posts of provincial governor, president and vice president. Can the antics of a few grassroots KMT politicians lure him into a trap? Soong has certainly expressed his interest in joining the Taipei mayoral race. And in the campaign to recall the president, he showed considerable acuity and displayed his ability to mobilize the public. But since then, he has adopted a wait-and-see attitude. This shows that Soong is still cautiously feeling out the situation and biding his time.
Soong certainly has ambitions for higher office. However, it would be foolish to ignore his political judgment. Those who believe that he can be entrapped by low-level political shenanigans are underestimating him. If Soong decides to throw his hat into the ring, then this would be based on his careful consideration and his party's interests. Soong's current reticence is probably intended to maintain his popularity among pan-blue supporters, or is in preparation for using his China trip in September to build momentum ahead of the election. Regardless, no one can ignore Soong's role in the Taipei mayoral election. It is still too early to say whether his decision will help him start afresh or end his political career.
Though nobody can completely rule out the existence of a plot to eliminate Soong from the nation's political scene, the idea smacks of conspiracy theory and is unworthy of serious consideration. Although the Taipei mayoral election is a secondary government election, it could build momentum for a victory in the 2008 presidential elections. The election is also a chance for the DPP to revive its fortunes after having been tarnished by scandals involving the first family. Both the KMT and DPP will be paying close attention to Soong's next move. However, conspiracy theories aimed at manipulating his choice of whether he contests the mayoral election are likely to backfire, and voters will only have contempt for such schemes.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS