I was riding the MRT the other day to National Taiwan University to interview some disgruntled history postgraduates when I came across a most peculiar scene. Four Cantonese speakers boarded the carriage, and after a few minutes of peering at the MRT map, they started talking rather loudly about (I assume) whether they caught the right train.
Then, a nice lady stood up and walked over to them, speaking Mandarin and asking if they needed help. But they didn't understand a word of the "national language," and after half a minute of increasing frustration, the lady launched into passable English on the assumption that they might know a few basic phrases (they seemed to be from Hong Kong, after all).
Well, they didn't, and in the end the lady had to usher them off the train in the hope that standing on a platform might increase their chances of finding the right route.
Taiwan: A place where people use English to bring the Children of the Dragon together -- for tourism purposes, at least.
But first things first. What's the point of building bridges using foreign languages when you can't communicate in your own?
Take President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮), who share two tongues but can't make head or tail of each other.
Over the years that this pair has occupied the Presidential Office, there has been a communication failure of such seriousness that Lu has effectively been running her own show.
During their first term, Lu moaned about how women never had enough power, especially vice presidents, and that she was capable of so much more. Now that she has a bit more power -- picture Lady Macbeth cast by John Waters -- she thinks that lecturing and undermining the president is part of the job description.
So we turn to the week's developments, which have been dominated by "green-camp friendly" academics suggesting Chen resign and Lu take his place. Oh, A-bian, you know you're in trouble when you've alienated the most sanctimonious and self-pitying group of people in the country. Forget meddling monks; enter the scheming scholars.
Last Saturday, a group of these unheralded saviors of the nation called a press conference to ask Chen to quit. They were propelled by Academia Sinica political scientist Chien Yung-hsiang's (錢永祥) call (published in the same day's China Times) for Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) and former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Lin I-hsiung (林義雄) to push for Chen's removal.
This strange crew included sociologists Fan Yun (范雲), Wu Nai-teh (吳乃德), Wu Chieh-min (吳介民) and Chen Ming-chi (陳明祺); Taiwan historian Wu Rwei-ren (吳叡人); Kaohsiung Incident veterans and one-time political prisoners Chang Fu-chung (張富忠) and Chi Wan-sheng (紀萬生); and political scientists Huang Chang-ling (黃長玲) and Tao Yi-fen (陶儀芬).
They said that if Chen stepped down, a tremendous contribution will have been made to the development of Taiwan's democracy because it would clean the slate and allow someone else to do a better job.
Stop right there. Amazing, is it not, that this group can be so erudite and have such impressive democratic credentials, yet not have the ability to open a dictionary and look up the meaning of "democracy"? If they have it their way, it'll be trial-by-polling-firm under the supervision of an academic Star Chamber all the way until the next premature election, and the next premature election after that.
You can also give the boffins among this group some brownie points for tenacity. Years of evidence of the unreliability of Internet polling didn't stop them from seeking support from anonymous Netizens in their all-talk, no-action campaign.
No wonder, then, that their online petition asking Chen to fall on his sword received support from Chen himself, as well as first lady Wu Shu-jen (
Hey guys, I know it's summer and getting pretty hot out there, but couldn't you have shed the egghead stereotype and hauled your lazy asses from your air-conditioned offices and out onto the street to collect signatures and addresses from real people?
But there's another thing that academics should do when making authoritative statements, (especially sociologists, who are prone to conflating science with activism): Declare your interests.
"Pan-green academics attack Chen" was the generic headline after these guys stood up to be discounted, but what they didn't disclose was several strong links to Lin I-hsiung, the latest addition in a line of former DPP luminaries to place ego above party and country. Lin has been sniping at the president ever since the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant debacle, which Lin in part triggered through his quixotic opposition to the project.
So, for once, I say thank you to the United Daily News and reporter Huang Ya-shih (
Lin himself, like all good spiritual leaders of would-be factions, has stayed aloof, saying he doesn't want to get involved in any campaign -- but for good measure he gave his full support to this gang in the cause of removing Chen from office. Thanks for that, old chap. The KMT check's in the mail. You may now shave your head and make a pilgrimage to Yushan (
Clearly, being a sociologist or a political scientist makes you no less vulnerable to being a moron in public. But in case you need it spelled out for you, O Wise Ones of Academe, this crisis is not about factionalism, Chen's competence or his personal fate. It's about the credibility of the political system and due process being followed when the system shows up faults.
Presidents, even ineffectual ones, are under no obligation to resign. They can be impeached by the Control Yuan or recalled by the legislature, but if neither happens, then the president has the mandate of the Constitution and the imprimatur of the people to stay in office.
If someone can find a place in the Republic of China Constitution where it says: "A prevaricating putz shall resign from the office of president within two weeks of refusing to account for the poor marital choices or venality of family members," then e-mail me at the address below. I'll be waiting.
And take the good dope from Johnny: In an ideal world, my dear scholars, your careers would be on the line -- not because of your naive politics, but because of your professional stupidity. Internet petition?
Then there's irresponsibility. Wu Nai-teh seems to be the point man for the Annette Lu Ineptitude Appreciation Society when he says that Taiwan should give the veep a chance as prez. This, despite nearly six-and-a-half years of upstaging her boss with ideas and asides of abject idiocy (granted, it has been very easy to upstage Chen, who has turned out to be, like his latest accusers, far more talk than action).
I'll admit that when it comes to me and Annette Lu, it's personal. It's not easy when something you dearly believe in -- a Taiwanese state -- is derailed in part by an individual who makes a mockery of the cause through unchecked vanity and bombast.
And that's what she's done as an also ran; imagine what she could do as the big cheese.
Let's take a little trip down vice presidential memory lane, shall we?
Remember when Annette Lu:
* Wanted entire Aboriginal villages moved to Central America in order to stop mountain erosion?
* Said that extinct "black pygmies" were the first (and therefore real) Aborigines, anyway?
* Said AIDS was a form of divine punishment and supported rounding up the nation's sufferers of HIV/AIDS and dumping them in their own quarantined village?
* Claimed she was the main target of the assassination attempt on the eve of the presidential election?
* Used the Presidential Office's now-defunct human rights advisory panel to pressure police over the confiscation of a DVD lampooning pan-blue camp figures?
* Was alleged to have claimed DPP Legislator Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) was getting her leg over the president? Lu did not make the allegation if you believe the court that punished the magazine for printing it. But it is not disputed that Lu gossiped with The Journalist magazine's reporter, which wasn't very smart.
* Praised the Moonies for promoting world peace and "ideal families"?
* Blamed men for all of the world's evils?
Ahh, takes you back, doesn't it?
Lu should be out there campaigning hard against demands for Chen to resign over the alleged sins of his family.
Instead, at the one moment in her post-martial law career when opening her mouth might be beneficial to the nation, she sits back, in all likelihood delighted at Chen's predicament and salivating at the very thought of it -- her last shot at being a big shot.
A Taipei Times editorial from a few years back said that a "mixture of inanity and winsomeness [is] a Lu trademark."
I can't put it any better than that, but I will add that Lu has spent her career turning up her nose at the achievements of others while downplaying her dependence on good Samaritans for career advancement.
So, let me wrap this up in language that even a monolingual Cantonese tourist might understand. Anyone who thinks a president should resign when he has committed no crime and is fulfilling whatever tasks are left after a hostile legislature has had its way is a sworn political enemy, a dunce, or both.
And whatever Chen's faults, anyone who thinks Annette Lu is competent to take his place is certifiable. No, more than that: an enemy of the state.
Finally, dear reader, remember this: the Great Jogger Ma Ying-jeou himself has welcomed the idea of an interim Lu presidency.
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Heard or read something particularly objectionable about Taiwan? Johnny wants to know: dearjohnny@taipeitimes.com is the place to reach me, with "Dear Johnny" in the subject line.
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Although former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo — known for being the most pro-Taiwan official to hold the post — is not in the second administration of US president-elect Donald Trump, he has maintained close ties with the former president and involved himself in think tank activities, giving him firsthand knowledge of the US’ national strategy. On Monday, Pompeo visited Taiwan for the fourth time, attending a Formosa Republican Association’s forum titled “Towards Permanent World Peace: The Shared Mission of the US and Taiwan.” At the event, he reaffirmed his belief in Taiwan’s democracy, liberty, human rights and independence, highlighting a
RSS