The Council of Labor Affairs has made very good use of a very bad week for the Chen administration. What better time to announce policy changes that stab foreign workers in the back than when everyone is busy being dazzled by tales of the first family's woe?
The council ought to have been embarrassed by a report from the US State Department that chided Taiwan for failing to address the "serious level of forced labor and sexual servitude among legally migrating Southeast Asian contract workers and brides." The report also expressed concern over the treatment of workers who then flee exploitative working conditions.
Yet the council seems to think that foreigners still have it too good, and are rewriting the rules to please big business, all the while defending token "measures" that defend the rights of workers who are being abused or otherwise taken advantage of. It is as if the Kaohsiung MRT riot never happened.
Speaking of which, it is instructive that the council is washing its hands of the 700 mostly Thai laborers who were here at the time of the riot and who have been or will be sent home, contracts not renewed. This is an act of retaliation by the Kaohsiung City Council, which has made sure that the workers got their comeuppance. Result? The MRT project is now short of labor to the tune of 400 workers.
We also note with disgust the council's intention to abolish the minimum monthly wage of NT$15,840 (US$483) for foreigners. This will increase mistreatment of workers -- many of whom are already forced to go into years of debt by thug labor brokers to have the privilege of working here.
But even by this council's standards, Minister Lee Ying-yuan's (
As if all of this weren't contemptible enough, the council now wants to issue new forgery-proof integrated circuit cards to foreign workers to prevent them from "committing crimes" and "ensuring national security." How a piece of plastic will stop a laborer from stealing a pack of instant noodles, let alone weaken the nation's borders, is beyond us.
More troubling, however, is the anticipated cost of the program: a cool NT$500 million (US$15.27 million). All of this is money that could have been spent on genuine improvements to administrative and emergency support for foreigners. It turns out that it was utter fantasy that such things could be expected of the council.
It should be noted that there is a definite bias against Southeast Asians in the council's operations. Nationals from Western and other wealthy countries have any number of informal resources at their disposal to dispute and contest mistreatment by employers. But what can one do for workers who are allowed to be confined to quarters courtesy of a council-backed curfew?
This is a non-partisan issue. It is clear that both sides of politics could not care less about the exploitation of foreigners by local industry -- because both sides of politics cherish their connections with big business. For this reason, it cannot be assumed that the situation will improve with the arrival of a new government and a new minister.
This is a pity, because once human rights have been dealt with, there is the niggling problem of quality control. The less you pay, the less you get, and this is no less true with foreign labor. This government -- and the Council of Labor Affairs in particular -- seems to be bereft of any understanding that good labor relations produce good product.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS