Although conflict between the pan-greens and pan-blues has eased since the legislature voted down the presidential recall motion, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) still must solve their political difficulties, and the nation still finds itself in dire straits politically. If the government does not move forward, the DPP will be punished in the year-end mayoral elections in Taipei and Kaohsiung, and in the legislative elections next year.
A closer look shows that the nation's democracy is fraught with problems that will not be resolved simply by Chen stepping down or the DPP losing power. These problems will remain until the next president takes office, and maybe after that. They include the democratic system of the central government, presidential competence and decision-making, political chaos in the legislature and the health of our democracy.
An evaluation of the prospects for the nation's democracy based on these core issues does not lead to much optimism. It will take a long time to establish an effective democratic system. In addition, the unclear definitions of presidential responsibilities and power have led to inefficiencies in all administrative agencies.
Chen's use of power is the main reason for the government's problems. Although Chen decided to delegate power to Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), the results of this have yet to be seen because Chen is still holding the ball. This is a matter of structure; that is, it is essential to reform the central government and determine whether it is a presidential or a Cabinet system.
Democratic reform at the center must be achieved through constitutional amendments. But as long as the DPP is in power, these are unlikely unless the party can propose amendments that transcend the independence-unification dispute and provide room for rational discussion of democracy at the central level and consensus across party lines.
Another reason for pessimism is that if the KMT were to regain power in 2008, it would still be difficult to restructure democratic policies at the central level.
The recall effort brought to light serious shortcomings in Chen's ability to govern and his decision-making. However, what truly concerns the public is not that Chen has faults, but that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
It is difficult to predict the outcome of the 2008 presidential election, but Ma probably has the best chance of winning, despite the recall motion debacle. For more astute observers, however, the recall campaign exposed Ma's lack of leadership and severe flaws in decision-making.
Ma backtracked in his approach to the recall attempt due to pressure from hardcore pan-blue elements, including People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜). Ma was unable to firmly state his stance and rally the more elite elements of his party.
The campaign was hatched by rabble rousers who lacked the savvy to instill their cause with true persuasive force. The pan-blues' courting of former DPP chairman Lin I-hsiung (林義雄) and the National Policy Advisory Committee, as well as attempts to turn pan-green legislators against Chen, were fruitless and exposed the pan-blues' immaturity.
The recall motion was doomed to failure, and the way Ma handled the matter offers a clue to how he might run the nation. This is especially worrying since the key to being a capable president lies not in wielding power like a dictator, but in establishing effective decision-making.
Chen has failed to establish these mechanisms; however, Ma has failed to demonstrate -- both as Taipei mayor and KMT chairman -- that he is more able to do so.
Of all the political bodies that make up the government, the legislature is the least trusted or respected. Polls indicate that the legislature falls below even Chen on these measures. The KMT has found a home in this distrusted political environment, using the body as a base for sabotaging executive governance; this tactic represents the main obstacle to democratic development.
Moreover, the halving of legislative seats for the next elections makes matters worse because the same amount of power will be shared by fewer legislators -- more power per legislator.
Another factor to consider is that electoral districts will be redrawn to reflect the new legislature. The KMT will also likely secure an even bigger majority. That in turn will result in the continued stalling of democratic reform. The DPP, after all, lacks the power to push for reform, while the KMT basically refuses to entertain anything proposed by the DPP.
Finally, the opposition and ruling parties, and the general public, lack a certain democratic fervor; this poses the greatest obstacle to democratic development. The recall campaign demonstrated that too many people, especially those in the media, believe in the "rule of virtue."
These people do not distinguish between morality and the rule of law. Viewing an opponent as an enemy and then attacking that person is not an act of democracy -- it's just a street fight.
Moreover, when one picks a fight with one's enemies, they often end up looking like victims and martyrs, no matter how immoral they are.
The phenomenon of "star" political commentators has become a mainstream symbol for justice, when in fact it is far removed from democratic principles. These commentators' monopoly on public dialogue violates the spirit of democracy. Elevating the quality of the democratic system is the most challenging task of democratization; the emerging culture of star commentators and allegations makes an already arduous task even more difficult.
These formidable problems are not bumps on the road to a more mature democracy that can be ironed out in three to five years. These problems will not be solved by installing a new leader in the Presidential Office either. We need to devote more time and energy to promoting democratic reform.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a research fellow at the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Daniel Cheng and Max Hirsch
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS