Although conflict between the pan-greens and pan-blues has eased since the legislature voted down the presidential recall motion, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) still must solve their political difficulties, and the nation still finds itself in dire straits politically. If the government does not move forward, the DPP will be punished in the year-end mayoral elections in Taipei and Kaohsiung, and in the legislative elections next year.
A closer look shows that the nation's democracy is fraught with problems that will not be resolved simply by Chen stepping down or the DPP losing power. These problems will remain until the next president takes office, and maybe after that. They include the democratic system of the central government, presidential competence and decision-making, political chaos in the legislature and the health of our democracy.
An evaluation of the prospects for the nation's democracy based on these core issues does not lead to much optimism. It will take a long time to establish an effective democratic system. In addition, the unclear definitions of presidential responsibilities and power have led to inefficiencies in all administrative agencies.
Chen's use of power is the main reason for the government's problems. Although Chen decided to delegate power to Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), the results of this have yet to be seen because Chen is still holding the ball. This is a matter of structure; that is, it is essential to reform the central government and determine whether it is a presidential or a Cabinet system.
Democratic reform at the center must be achieved through constitutional amendments. But as long as the DPP is in power, these are unlikely unless the party can propose amendments that transcend the independence-unification dispute and provide room for rational discussion of democracy at the central level and consensus across party lines.
Another reason for pessimism is that if the KMT were to regain power in 2008, it would still be difficult to restructure democratic policies at the central level.
The recall effort brought to light serious shortcomings in Chen's ability to govern and his decision-making. However, what truly concerns the public is not that Chen has faults, but that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
It is difficult to predict the outcome of the 2008 presidential election, but Ma probably has the best chance of winning, despite the recall motion debacle. For more astute observers, however, the recall campaign exposed Ma's lack of leadership and severe flaws in decision-making.
Ma backtracked in his approach to the recall attempt due to pressure from hardcore pan-blue elements, including People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜). Ma was unable to firmly state his stance and rally the more elite elements of his party.
The campaign was hatched by rabble rousers who lacked the savvy to instill their cause with true persuasive force. The pan-blues' courting of former DPP chairman Lin I-hsiung (林義雄) and the National Policy Advisory Committee, as well as attempts to turn pan-green legislators against Chen, were fruitless and exposed the pan-blues' immaturity.
The recall motion was doomed to failure, and the way Ma handled the matter offers a clue to how he might run the nation. This is especially worrying since the key to being a capable president lies not in wielding power like a dictator, but in establishing effective decision-making.
Chen has failed to establish these mechanisms; however, Ma has failed to demonstrate -- both as Taipei mayor and KMT chairman -- that he is more able to do so.
Of all the political bodies that make up the government, the legislature is the least trusted or respected. Polls indicate that the legislature falls below even Chen on these measures. The KMT has found a home in this distrusted political environment, using the body as a base for sabotaging executive governance; this tactic represents the main obstacle to democratic development.
Moreover, the halving of legislative seats for the next elections makes matters worse because the same amount of power will be shared by fewer legislators -- more power per legislator.
Another factor to consider is that electoral districts will be redrawn to reflect the new legislature. The KMT will also likely secure an even bigger majority. That in turn will result in the continued stalling of democratic reform. The DPP, after all, lacks the power to push for reform, while the KMT basically refuses to entertain anything proposed by the DPP.
Finally, the opposition and ruling parties, and the general public, lack a certain democratic fervor; this poses the greatest obstacle to democratic development. The recall campaign demonstrated that too many people, especially those in the media, believe in the "rule of virtue."
These people do not distinguish between morality and the rule of law. Viewing an opponent as an enemy and then attacking that person is not an act of democracy -- it's just a street fight.
Moreover, when one picks a fight with one's enemies, they often end up looking like victims and martyrs, no matter how immoral they are.
The phenomenon of "star" political commentators has become a mainstream symbol for justice, when in fact it is far removed from democratic principles. These commentators' monopoly on public dialogue violates the spirit of democracy. Elevating the quality of the democratic system is the most challenging task of democratization; the emerging culture of star commentators and allegations makes an already arduous task even more difficult.
These formidable problems are not bumps on the road to a more mature democracy that can be ironed out in three to five years. These problems will not be solved by installing a new leader in the Presidential Office either. We need to devote more time and energy to promoting democratic reform.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a research fellow at the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Daniel Cheng and Max Hirsch
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS