Taiwan's first-ever presidential recall bid has come to a close. What concerns the public now is not so much the redrawing of political lines and agendas, but how the recall proceedings have further strained relations between the pan-greens and pan-blues. Some believe that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has sought to shift the pressure from the scandals off himself and re-exert influence over his party by mobilizing pan-green supporters and re-framing the recall motion as a battle between localization and sinification supporters.
I believe that the pan-green supporters' reaction to recent events is a sign of their frustration with the constant barrage of biased news against Chen and his administration by the "pan-blue influenced" media.
Corruption allegations against the Chen administration have obviously disheartened pan-green supporters -- after all, the pan-green camp was elected on a platform of "clean governance." This image has been tarnished in the face of mounting allegations against Chen's family members and aides. The Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) dwindling poll numbers reflect the public's disillusionment with the ruling party.
However, it should be noted that the politicians and TV pundits who have brought these scandals to light also lack credibility. Many of these allegations were often made with scant evidence to back them up, and the public was encouraged to connect the dots in the absence of any genuine proof.
Media outlets have also run unfiltered segments on these alleged scandals non-stop, relentlessly needling and angering pan-green viewers. The recall motion presented the perfect opportunity for fed-up pan-green supporters to finally come forward and speak out against the media's biased and unprofessional coverage.
The pan-blue camp, together with certain media outlets, has sought to undermine the administration by attempting to paint, piece by piece, an ugly image of a scandal-infested presidency.
However, I would like to suggest to media outlets that have accused Chen of manipulating his supporters and deepening the divide between the pan-greens and the pan-blues to draw attention away from the scandals that they reflect on how they themselves have manipulated public opinion through biased journalism.
Media personalities or politicians should think about their political accountability before spewing out accusations, and the content of their accusations should be submitted to the proper authorities for official scrutiny.
News outlets should fulfill the basic requirements of fact-checking and verification. They should also allow the defendants to respond to the charges as a means of demonstrating journalistic fairness and objectivity.
The media have thrown any semblance of discipline out the window, as shown by the sheer amount of airtime given to personal attacks initiated by politicians and commentators who seem to think that "supplying evidence" and carrying out "independent verification" are foreign concepts.
As a result of this undisciplined reporting, the masses have difficulty distinguishing between what is true and false, and the media have failed to perform their most important function of presenting news accurately and conscientiously.
However, I am not proposing that the media should make their own political judgment or form their own political stand. Rather, when conducting news reports, the media should maintain a balanced structure that gives equal play to various news sources and parties, and work for the promotion of social values and the public interest. This is what is called "media ethics" -- a universal value that all media outlets should pursue.
It is a pity that the local media have chosen to ignore such ethics, resulting not only in the loss of their authority to ensure social justice, but also in their being exploited by certain politicians as a means to intensify ethnic and political divisions.
If media outlets continue to focus merely on the blue-green divide, how can we blame the public for questioning their veracity?
Lee Wen-chung is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
Translated by Daniel Cheng and Lin Ya-ti
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS