On Sunday, Taipei's oldest food market, the Jiancheng Circle (
Following a massive and expensive renovation by the Taipei City Government, the building, which had stood on the site for 98 years, is gone and, along with it, a cultural and historical landmark that had served Taipei residents as well as visitors from other parts of the country and abroad.
While many lament the market's closure, its demise also highlights Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (
In an attempt to modernize the decades-old market, Ma ordered the demolition of the food circle in March 2001 and had the Taipei City Government spend lots of money to renovate the market.
However, the resulting structure failed to live up to its theme -- the circle of life -- based on the design by Taiwanese architect C.Y. Lee (
In Ma's view, the two-story cylindrical glass building that re-opened in October 2003 was a testament to the beauty and wonder of modern architecture, which did away with the aged, congested, disorderly array of vendors and stalls that filled the old market.
However, to the eyes of many Taipei residents, especially those living nearby, it was a cold, glass monster that bore no trace of the market's good and familiar architectural style, history and culture.
To top it all, the renovated structure neglected the very element that had made the night market fun and memorable -- the priceless local touch that's distinctly Taiwanese in flavor. It might have been a little crowded, slightly filthy or a bit shabby, but it had a distinctly warm, human element.
Ma probably meant well when he sought to improve the old Jiancheng Circle.
But the ironic part is that the very effort by the Taipei City Government to modernize the time-honored market was the least progressive idea of all.
Sure, the Jiancheng Circle was not a glamour house like Taipei 101, nor did it resemble anything like the upscale shoeboxes that hawk brandname items in the Xinyi commercial district.
But old does not always mean outdated, nor does everything new equate with progress.
Having survived two fires -- one in 1993 and another in 1999 -- the market remained a very visible city landmark. It was one of the most popular night markets since the Japanese colonial era, where generations shared fond memories of childhood afternoon snack-runs, young people dating or a family night out.
While Ma wasn't the architect of the new building, he contributed to its failure and decline.
Like any good manager or marketer, he should know that the key to selling something is to tailor it to what people want, and not what he thinks they want.
After all, a mayor is elected to serve the people and not his own personal agenda.
While Ma may view his two-term mayoral tenure as a step to a higher political post, he is off to a bad start if after living on this soil for decades, he still can't identify what the Taiwanese want or need.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS