President Chen Shui-bian (
Many observers say Lee's decision to go public at that moment helped Chen gain the votes to win by a narrow margin in the three-way presidential race against James Soong (
Chen certainly owes Lee an apology for letting him down (though the political value of a public apology remains dubious). Lee took risks to support Chen. As head of the Academia Sinica and the first native Taiwanese to win a Nobel Prize, Lee commands enormous respect and exerts considerable influence in this country. Moreover, he had little to gain personally from taking his stance. Nor did he have much to gain if Chen did well. Perhaps, as an academic, he still had a strong sense of idealism that prompted him to express his support. However, because of Chen's less-than-satisfactory performance, Lee has been criticized for supporting him. In addition to becoming a scapegoat for the pan-blue camp, Lee's image as an impartial academic who rose above petty politics and self-interest was tarnished.
Chen owes even more of an apology to those people who have voted for him in the last two presidential elections -- including those who were influenced by Lee's support. Those swayed by Lee were mostly those who identify with Lee's neutral and impartial image -- the so-called moderate voters.
After Chen apologized, some pro-blue-camp commentators were calling for Lee to apologize to the general public for Chen's performance. But does Lee really owe the public an apology?
The answer would depend on whether those who voted for Chen would have voted for him knowing what the next six years would bring. Can anyone say with confidence that Taiwan would be a much happier and less corrupt place if Lien or Soong had been elected in 2000?
Were Lien elected, Taiwan would have continued under the rule of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), a party that had never had the experience of being out of power in Taiwan, and it would not have been taught a lesson in democracy. Perhaps the KMT might have fumbled less in terms of handling domestic affairs, but there would have been little incentive for the party to do something about the black gold politics that the party cultivated over decades of murky links between the state, the party, the private sector and local gangsters.
As for Soong, his departure from the KMT came about simply because he wanted to be president. There is little reason to suspect that he would have behaved any differently from the KMT if he had been elected.
A change in power for the country was essential. Some may argue that Taiwan was not ready for this in 2000. But growing up early is better than growing up late. Just because Chen and the Democratic Progressive Party did not perform well does not mean that voting the KMT out was a mistake.
Chen and the DPP do owe its supporters an apology -- and now that it has been made, it's time to move on and work harder. Either way, Lee need apologize to no one.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS