The square in front of Kaohsiung's National Science and Technology Museum was much more raucous than usual on the last Sunday of last month. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma slammed President Chen Shui-bian's (
"Public discontent is boiling over, justifying a recall motion [against the president]," Ma said.
Such comments conveniently ignore the fact that the 6.6 percent economic growth rate under KMT rule in the 1960s was a product of the "no haste, be patient" policy, which Ma and the KMT today vehemently oppose. What's more, the 3.6 percent economic growth rate under DPP rule can be attributed to the Chen administration's espousal of economic strategies pushed for by the KMT, such as "active opening," "confident deregulation"and "courageously going west."
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was a vocal proponent of Taiwanese sovereignty when he headed the KMT and the nation, and opposed the establishment of Taiwan as an Asia-Pacific regional operations center with China as its hinterland. Under Lee's rule, Taiwan's stock market soared above 10,000 points in 1997 and 1999 as he managed to keep Taiwan's reliance on China as an export market below 25 percent of total exports. Although this was still not entirely satisfactory, it resulted in better global positioning for Taiwanese businesses.
All of this changed when the DPP became the ruling party in 2000. The party went against the grain of Lee's policies of restraint and began dancing to the KMT's tune, establishing direct cross-strait charter flights, liberalizing Taiwanese investment in China, and otherwise fostering economic integration.
And what have the consequences been? Today, Taiwan's export reliance on China has reached 37.8 percent of total exports, while trade with the US, Europe, and Southeast Asia has steadily declined. For Taiwan, globalization has become synonymous with Sinicization. Local enterprises quit the country and set up shop in China, leaving behind a gaping investment vacuum.
These are the circumstances under which Taiwan's growth rate has slowed to almost half of what it used to be in the roaring 1980s. In other words, the DPP's present troubles are the result of the economic roadmap Ma drew up for the KMT. The true irony in all this is that Ma is slamming the DPP for doing precisely what he has advocated that his own party do.
Last New Year's, Chen introduced his notion of "active management" to the public, with the goal of lessening Taiwan's dependence on China and departing from the pan-blues' economic roadmap.
The "active management" policy is focused on pushing growth back up toward 6.6 percent and fostering self-reliance; however, it was met with stiff resistance from not only pro-China elements but even from within the pan-green camp. Six months have passed since the strategy was touted, but it never got off the ground. Instead, old policies remain and the economy continues to hemorrhage.
The pan-blues, however, have nothing to celebrate. The economic slowdown brought on by the "active opening" policy has exposed the pan-blues' economic roadmap as a farce, and if they were to oversee liberalization themselves, the damage to the economy would be even more severe.
This is because their liberalization vis-a-vis China would be even more pronounced; they would usher in direct flights immediately and promote more integration, including allowing companies to invest more of their net value in China beyond the current 40 percent cap and scrapping other investment restrictions. Their position is, "Liberalize completely, and integrate completely with China. That's the only way to save Taiwan!" A number of DPP government officials feel the same way.
Is Taiwan's only road to salvation complete integration with China, as the pan-blues and some pan-greens would have us believe?
That would be like saying that after partially undressing and so feeling chilly, we need to be utterly nude in order to feel warm again.
I call on our DPP government officials to put their focus back on Taiwan, and derive lessons from what Ma shouted and screamed about at the Kaohsiung rally. If the DPP-led government is truly unable to buck the influence of big business and the pro-China media and continues following the KMT's economic roadmap, then Taiwan's economy will continue to suffer, a lesson history has already taught us. Taiwanese businesses may prosper in China, but for those remaining in Taiwan, taking up blue-collar work will be the only choice.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Max Hirsch
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS