Last week's Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) anti-President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) rallies across the nation were the last before all the wind went out of Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) sails. Unable to come up with something new to boost the recall motion against Chen, the rallies were merely a repeat of June 21. Since people have grown tired of the platitudes, Ma's return to a moderate path was necessary lest his support continue to fall.
At first, Ma did not wish to act before a case had been established, but then People First Party (PFP) James Soong (宋楚瑜) tricked him into pushing for the recall motion. Ma didn't shrink from talking tough and fabricating accusations of "assassination attempts" against him supposedly made on a call-in program on an underground radio station to whip up support for the cause.
His behavior, however, backfired as it prompted pan-green supporters to unite and launch a counterattack, forcing him to step back. At the last KMT-organized rally in Taipei prior to the recall vote, Soong was prevented from taking the stage, causing a fall-out between the two chairmen. If Ma wants a shot at the presidency in 2008, he and his aides should learn from the recall brouhaha and learn the importance of staying firm instead of turning with the wind.
Unwilling to go down like this, Ma is now trying to divide the pan-green camp and win over their supporters by using the slogan, "defend localization by terminating corruption."
Taiwan is a democratic society where political conflict takes place in the open. By coining this slogan, Ma has modeled himself instead on the highly oppressive ways of China, where one must pretend to support the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to be able to attack it. Likewise, Ma feigns pro-localization to attack the pro-localization agenda.
If Ma were really passionate about localization, he would be firm in his defense of Taiwan's sovereignty and the "one country on each side of the strait" formula. He comes off as a hypocrite, however, when claiming to defend localization after first having stated that his goal is to pursue "eventual unification." Or could it really be that he is going to call the state resulting from a unification between Taiwan and China the "Republic of Taiwan?"
In the run-up to the 2004 presidential election the KMT's image suffered a crisis. As a result, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
In the face of a Chinese invasion, Ma is opposed to passing the arms procurement bill in the legislature, nor did he allow KMT legislators to deliberate on the flood-control bill despite southern Taiwan being inundated. How can he claim to defend localization? Ma has sold plots of local land which were part of the KMT's stolen assets, rather than returning them to the public.
Ending corruption is no easy task. Exposing corruption is a good thing, but claiming that Chen's ouster will terminate corruption is naive. If Ma wants to combat corruption, he should start by surrendering the KMT's stolen assets and explaining his relationship with former Taitung County commissioner Wu Chun-li (吳俊立). He should clarify comments that Wu's detention on suspicion of corruption should not affect Wu's wife -- who won the seat Wu vacated -- as well as the rapid increase in his own fortune. If he does, he might win the 2008 presidential election without spending party assets on campaigning. But if he continues to rely on street violence for help, he might meet a nasty political end.
Paul Lin is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS