Don't believe the hype.
Representative politics is inherently theatrical, and in Taiwan, sometimes this theatricality approaches a level of vaudeville that would not be out of place in an old English music hall, complete with a master of ceremonies and an orchestra in the pit.
Despite the denunciations, the threats, the demonstrations, the lawsuits, the scandals and the breathless media coverage, this is a remarkably composed society that frowns on excessive behavior.
But if you believe some media commentators, there is a phenomenon of "chaos" (luan,
Were the hysterics on TV screens reflected in the regular behavior of ordinary people, there might be real cause for concern. But this is not the case.
It should be noted that conflict between pan-blue and pan-green supporters almost always takes place in predictable contexts, and bona fide troublemakers are usually closely accompanied by a suitable number of police.
It is also critical to note that instances of ethnic conflict unrelated to political campaigns do not occur with anywhere near the degree of spontaneity and violence that plague other countries. Most people have their conspicuous ethnic markers, but most will not let these precipitate a conflict.
Taiwan's politicians and political pundits are very fond of hyperbole, which retains appeal in a sensationalist media environment. Yet just a few hundred kilometers south of Taiwan is a country with serious problems that make Taiwanese references to luan seem precious and self-absorbed. The Philippines, with its entrenched poverty, terrorism threat, Muslim insurgency, rights abuses and other problems makes use of the word "chaos" here seem ridiculous.
It remains a common argument that Han people harbor a terrible fear of luan, and this has been used to justify repression and atrocities to prevent luan breaking out all over. There may be millions of reasons why China -- or, more accurately, the Chinese Communist Party and its business partners -- would peddle this kind of self-fulfilling prophecy. But it is those who gain from this propaganda who have the most potential to impose luan on nearby innocents.
A Chinese embargo, missile attack or invasion is of course the genuine luan that people ought to fear, but people do not in their day-to-day activities perceive this to be a realistic threat -- for the time being. It is as if there is an understanding that the warning signs for a cross-strait conflict would be telegraphed so far in advance that most believe intervention by mediators -- domestic or international -- would have its effect long before any punitive action eventuated. Pragmatic to the last, Taiwanese seem to know where true chaos lies, and what must be done to avoid it.
So enough of the use of the word "chaotic" to describe Taiwanese society, and here's hoping that this place will not need to see a repeat of events of 60 years ago to be reminded of what true chaos is.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017