On May 9, the UN General Assembly elected members from 47 nations to oversee the Human Rights Council. The newly created council replaced the Human Rights Commission, and its first meeting took place on June 19 in Geneva.
International human rights groups are very concerned about whether the council will be able to carry out its tasks free from political interference or manipulation by states known to be human rights abusers.
Prior to the council elections, incidents involving certain countries opposed to seeing rights abusers on the council underscored what a political hot potato the new body is. While the US announced it would boycott the council elections, Human Rights Watch criticized the General Assembly's move to elect China, Cuba, Russia, Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Saudi Arabia and Iran to the council.
The US believed that the membership criteria for the council were too lax and failed to screen out rights abusers, since the backing of only half of the 191 UN member states is needed to join the council. The US wanted to raise the bar by requiring council applicants to win the support of two-thirds of the UN's membership.
It was truly a pity that other UN members ignored the US' recommendation. The result was that 22 of the 47 countries elected to the council are listed by Freedom House as "not free" or "partly free" nations.
Among the "not free" are China, Algeria, Tunisia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Cameroon and Cuba. "Partly free" members include Morocco, Nigeria, Zambia, Bangladesh, Jordan, Malaysia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Ecuador and Guatemala.
So close to one-half of the council members are regarded by international human rights groups as rights abusers. Whether the council can carry out its mandate and avoid manipulation or interference by rights-abusing nations will determine its success or failure in the eyes of the international community.
Chen Lung-chu is chairman of the New Century Foundation and director of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS