After surviving the opposition's attempt to oust him on Tuesday in the country's first-ever presidential recall vote, this is not the time for President Chen Shui-bian (
With less than two years left in office, Chen needs to get down to business and work to regain the people's confidence in the integrity of his Democratic Progressive Party administration and its ability to govern.
Prior to Tuesday's vote, Chen said that he would seek to push cross-party consultations and cross-strait talks. After the vote, he once again apologized for the political and social upheaval -- much as he did in his televised address to the nation on June 20.
While all his pledges and vows sound nice, less talk and more action is what the country needs to recover from the past few weeks of political turmoil triggered by allegations of corruption against Chen's close associates and family members. Repeated apologies can too easily be interpreted by the public as a sign of incompetence.
After all, what Taiwan needs is not an apologetic president but one who is worthy of the public's respect, who gets work done and delivers on his promises.
People are forgetful, but not that forgetful. Many still remember and hold Chen to the pledges he made late last month -- to engage in introspection, no longer exercise any power beyond what is expressly defined by the Constitution for the role of the president and to reorganize the power structure of his administration in a bid to improve the image of his office.
Just because the crisis caused by the recall vote now appears to be over, this does not mean that Chen can forget what he has promised.
The president should start transforming his pledges into concrete action and re-equipping himself with the kind of determination he so often displayed when he was Taipei mayor.
Sure, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party have yet to do their jobs -- in terms of getting their legislators to review and pass the NT$3.7 trillion (US$113.3 billion) budget for state-owned enterprises, NT$100.7 billion for major infrastructure projects and NT$44.9 billion for flood-prevention efforts, including the dredging of Shihmen Reservoir.
But by the same token, there are tasks at hand for Chen as well. For starters, Chen should send new Control Yuan nominees to the legislature and appoint a new state public prosecutor-general.
True leadership shines through difficult times. Chen has the responsibility to live up to the public's expectations and focus on pushing ahead with effective policies that best serve the public and Taiwan's national interests.
He should remember that the public has entrusted him with a precious honor -- to go down in history as the head of the first pro-localization regime in Taiwan. The rest of his legacy is something that he has to work on now.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS