After surviving the opposition's attempt to oust him on Tuesday in the country's first-ever presidential recall vote, this is not the time for President Chen Shui-bian (
With less than two years left in office, Chen needs to get down to business and work to regain the people's confidence in the integrity of his Democratic Progressive Party administration and its ability to govern.
Prior to Tuesday's vote, Chen said that he would seek to push cross-party consultations and cross-strait talks. After the vote, he once again apologized for the political and social upheaval -- much as he did in his televised address to the nation on June 20.
While all his pledges and vows sound nice, less talk and more action is what the country needs to recover from the past few weeks of political turmoil triggered by allegations of corruption against Chen's close associates and family members. Repeated apologies can too easily be interpreted by the public as a sign of incompetence.
After all, what Taiwan needs is not an apologetic president but one who is worthy of the public's respect, who gets work done and delivers on his promises.
People are forgetful, but not that forgetful. Many still remember and hold Chen to the pledges he made late last month -- to engage in introspection, no longer exercise any power beyond what is expressly defined by the Constitution for the role of the president and to reorganize the power structure of his administration in a bid to improve the image of his office.
Just because the crisis caused by the recall vote now appears to be over, this does not mean that Chen can forget what he has promised.
The president should start transforming his pledges into concrete action and re-equipping himself with the kind of determination he so often displayed when he was Taipei mayor.
Sure, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party have yet to do their jobs -- in terms of getting their legislators to review and pass the NT$3.7 trillion (US$113.3 billion) budget for state-owned enterprises, NT$100.7 billion for major infrastructure projects and NT$44.9 billion for flood-prevention efforts, including the dredging of Shihmen Reservoir.
But by the same token, there are tasks at hand for Chen as well. For starters, Chen should send new Control Yuan nominees to the legislature and appoint a new state public prosecutor-general.
True leadership shines through difficult times. Chen has the responsibility to live up to the public's expectations and focus on pushing ahead with effective policies that best serve the public and Taiwan's national interests.
He should remember that the public has entrusted him with a precious honor -- to go down in history as the head of the first pro-localization regime in Taiwan. The rest of his legacy is something that he has to work on now.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS