The weeks of pan-blue campaigning against President Chen Shui-bian (
The fact that the bid was doomed from the beginning doesn't seem to have prevented the pan-blues from continuing with their campaign, oblivious that their actions may actually be causing more damage to Taiwan's reputation than that supposedly caused by the president and his administration.
Most people have probably forgotten that the initial recall bid was instigated by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Ting Shou-chung (
Ting decided to use the signatures he had already garnered for that bid in his latest try after the accusations concerning the president's son-in-law came to light. But then the pan-blues have tried to oust the president so many times over the last six years that every attempt just blurs into one prolonged bid to destroy and discredit the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government.
A look at the 10 charges leveled against the president as part of this latest recall bid illustrate what a shame it is: The Chen administration has destroyed the Constitution; thrown politics into complete disarray through its authoritarian methods; severely restricted freedom of speech and suppressed the media. Do the pan-blues really expect anyone to believe such fantasies?
This latest bid to oust the president and harm the pan-green camp's image can be construed as part of a "long war" in the runup to the 2008 presidential election. The opposition has placed so much importance on winning back the presidency that the Taiwanese public is in for a long and arduous media crusade against all things green over the next 18 months or so. But will this campaign really serve the best interests of the opposition?
The recall controversy already seems to have caused a split between People First Party Chairman James Soong (
Ma has already done damage to his clean-cut image of being above the most fervent partisan blue-green scrapping. It looks as if he has decided to pull back and protect himself.
That leaves Soong and his small band of supporters to continue with what is in effect their anti-Chen campaign in front of the Legislative Yuan. Many believe that Soong has taken the leading role in the recall bid as a way to gauge his popularity before announcing a bid for Taipei mayor. If this is the case, then the paltry turnout at the various rallies and other events the PFP has organized over the last couple of weeks should tell him all he needs to know. If he were to stand for Taipei mayor and suffer defeat, it really could spell the end of his career. Soong is far too canny to take such a risk.
It may be true that the DPP administration has not done a great job over the last six years. But if the pan-blues had just been patient, waited another two years and acted like a rational, reasonable opposition that was interested in promoting prosperity, good health and the well-being of the people of Taiwan, they would probably have walked to victory in 2008.
After all, in what is effectively a two-party system, when the public is disappointed with one party then the opposition is more or less guaranteed to win the next time around. But what happens when the electorate is disillusioned with both sides?
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS