The weeks of pan-blue campaigning against President Chen Shui-bian (
The fact that the bid was doomed from the beginning doesn't seem to have prevented the pan-blues from continuing with their campaign, oblivious that their actions may actually be causing more damage to Taiwan's reputation than that supposedly caused by the president and his administration.
Most people have probably forgotten that the initial recall bid was instigated by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Ting Shou-chung (
Ting decided to use the signatures he had already garnered for that bid in his latest try after the accusations concerning the president's son-in-law came to light. But then the pan-blues have tried to oust the president so many times over the last six years that every attempt just blurs into one prolonged bid to destroy and discredit the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government.
A look at the 10 charges leveled against the president as part of this latest recall bid illustrate what a shame it is: The Chen administration has destroyed the Constitution; thrown politics into complete disarray through its authoritarian methods; severely restricted freedom of speech and suppressed the media. Do the pan-blues really expect anyone to believe such fantasies?
This latest bid to oust the president and harm the pan-green camp's image can be construed as part of a "long war" in the runup to the 2008 presidential election. The opposition has placed so much importance on winning back the presidency that the Taiwanese public is in for a long and arduous media crusade against all things green over the next 18 months or so. But will this campaign really serve the best interests of the opposition?
The recall controversy already seems to have caused a split between People First Party Chairman James Soong (
Ma has already done damage to his clean-cut image of being above the most fervent partisan blue-green scrapping. It looks as if he has decided to pull back and protect himself.
That leaves Soong and his small band of supporters to continue with what is in effect their anti-Chen campaign in front of the Legislative Yuan. Many believe that Soong has taken the leading role in the recall bid as a way to gauge his popularity before announcing a bid for Taipei mayor. If this is the case, then the paltry turnout at the various rallies and other events the PFP has organized over the last couple of weeks should tell him all he needs to know. If he were to stand for Taipei mayor and suffer defeat, it really could spell the end of his career. Soong is far too canny to take such a risk.
It may be true that the DPP administration has not done a great job over the last six years. But if the pan-blues had just been patient, waited another two years and acted like a rational, reasonable opposition that was interested in promoting prosperity, good health and the well-being of the people of Taiwan, they would probably have walked to victory in 2008.
After all, in what is effectively a two-party system, when the public is disappointed with one party then the opposition is more or less guaranteed to win the next time around. But what happens when the electorate is disillusioned with both sides?
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS