Following President Chen Shui-bian's (
However, any pan-blue move to conduct a vote of no confidence in the Cabinet would lead to a dissolution of the legislature, and so we are now entering a temporary balance of terror between the pan-blue and pan-green forces. It remains to be seen how the two opposing camps will strategically place themselves in relation to the other side. Will the pan-blues really push for a no confidence vote against Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌)? And will the pan-greens then support a decision by the president to dissolve the legislature and hold new legislative elections?
The pan-green camp says that so long as there is no vote of no confidence in the Cabinet, then the legislature will not be dissolved, and the more the pan-blues push for a no confidence vote, the more certain it is that the legislature will be dissolved.
The pan-blues, however, think the reverse is true. That is, the pan-blues believe that the pan-greens are so fearful of a crushing defeat in a fresh round of legislative elections that they will not dare run the risk of asking the president to dissolve the legislature. The risk that the pan-blues are running is that the pan-green camp really is determined to dissolve the legislature at any cost.
Have the pan-blues then prepared themselves for the ensuing legislative elections? More importantly, even if the pan-blue camp is right about the green camp's fears, will the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) accept Chen's decision if he nominates Ma to the premiership?
If the pan-greens are sensible, they should understand that they cannot afford to face new legislative elections, because the electorate is no longer on their side. However, according to the Constitution and constitutional precedents set by other nations, the outgoing Cabinet can stay on as a caretaker Cabinet led by the incumbent premier or vice premier, a situation that prevails until the new Cabinet is appointed.
In other words, if the pan-blues successfully topple the Cabinet, they would actually help the pan-greens take advantage of this constitutional opportunity -- they could simply refrain from nominating a premier from either the pan-blue or pan-green camps. If that happens, the pan-green camp will formally be off the hook, while the pan-blues will end up being blamed for staging a political campaign to usurp power. They will not be able to form a Cabinet, and may even lose their support in future elections.
If the president dissolves the legislature following a successful no confidence vote, then new legislative elections will have to be convened within 60 days. Although the pan-greens run the risk of being routed in the ensuing legislative elections, a new round of elections will also catch the pan-blues off guard. The process of redrawing the nation's electoral districts has not been completed yet and any confusion during the campaign will reflect badly on the pan-blues.
The Constitution also allows Chen to submit a request to the Council of Grand Justices to deliver an interpretation of whether the legislature elected following a dissolution is a genuinely "new" legislature (ie, the seventh) or an "interim" legislature, to be retained until the seventh legislature is elected as planned late next year. If the latter, then the pan-blue camp, which might do well in the short term, could face a backlash in the legislative and presidential elections next year and the year after.
Chen Chao-chien is an assistant professor in the department of public affairs at Ming Chuan University.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS