The recent controversy over whether two talk show hosts of the cable station TVBS -- Lee Tao (李濤) and his wife, Lee Yen-chiu (李豔秋) -- provided an opposition lawmaker with information that formed the basis of allegations of first lady Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍) accepting a large amount of vouchers from Sogo Department Store has sparked a debate on the role of the media in Taiwan's politically divided society.
The truth has yet to be revealed, but the issue highlights an even more serious problem that necessitates a careful study. Lee Tao's talk show, 2100 Quan Min Kai Jiang (2100
The show's disclosure of former DPP deputy secretary-general Chen Che-nan's (
However, the way Lee and his so-called coterie of "famous speakers" have conducted themselves throughout this affair shows a shameless lack of journalistic ethics and professionalism that poses a danger to the nation's democracy because of the implied negative connection between politicians and media personnel.
In today's atmosphere of 24-hour news and instant information, where public opinion can change in a flash and missteps are magnified on a grand scale, the role of the press should not only be that of a fact-describer but also a valuable educator.
Regretfully, the changes in domestic politics over the last two decades, as well as the liberalization of the media industry, have given birth to intense competition and a lowering of the quality of Taiwanese media. With the way things are often politicized in the country, the media has gradually lost its focus.
Aside from the lack of professionalism, there has been an overemphasis on trivial or sensational inside stories. When the media gradually loses its self-discipline, it becomes a tool for politicians and people with vested interests.
Many believe in the power of the press. This conviction that the media is a powerful tool for swaying voters is what drives some news editors, reporters and call-in show hosts to exaggerate and even make up news stories. The principle of verifying the sources of news has in many cases become nothing but empty talk.
Because of this biased media culture, many have fallen into the typical cycle of political maneuvering. And the result is that the credibility of both the politicians and the media are downgraded. Lee and his talk show are the typical products of the nation's unique and unhealthy politics.
Even the attempts to institutionalize media structure has been tainted by political interference. The establishment of the National Communications Commission as an independent mechanism to examine media operations became an arena for political wrangling last year. The pan-blue camp's nominees secured a majority in the commission, which has sabotaged the credibility of the commission.
Despite all these manipulations, the public will one day wake up to the truth. When the public finally sees the true picture -- as what has happened with some of the allegations relating to the Sogo voucher case -- these political maneuverings and tactics can backfire.
Indeed, there has been a number of complaints from the people on these news reports and shows, which goes to show that in the end it is the public who decides independently of the media. People will pay attention to what they want to, regardless of what the media think is important. The public knows best.
More and more public polls now show that people have become greatly suspicious of the media and increasingly sophisticated in spotting its attempts at manipulation.
The public now sees the media as a kind of special interest group, no more objective than or independent of any other social groups in presenting its view.
Perhaps this is the only constructive way to strengthen media discipline and professionalism. Institutional reform is not perfect and often is only the first step to provide a fair competition environment for the media. Public monitoring constitutes the key to mature media competition and a well-implemented social responsibility of the media.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS