The recent controversy over whether two talk show hosts of the cable station TVBS -- Lee Tao (李濤) and his wife, Lee Yen-chiu (李豔秋) -- provided an opposition lawmaker with information that formed the basis of allegations of first lady Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍) accepting a large amount of vouchers from Sogo Department Store has sparked a debate on the role of the media in Taiwan's politically divided society.
The truth has yet to be revealed, but the issue highlights an even more serious problem that necessitates a careful study. Lee Tao's talk show, 2100 Quan Min Kai Jiang (2100
The show's disclosure of former DPP deputy secretary-general Chen Che-nan's (
However, the way Lee and his so-called coterie of "famous speakers" have conducted themselves throughout this affair shows a shameless lack of journalistic ethics and professionalism that poses a danger to the nation's democracy because of the implied negative connection between politicians and media personnel.
In today's atmosphere of 24-hour news and instant information, where public opinion can change in a flash and missteps are magnified on a grand scale, the role of the press should not only be that of a fact-describer but also a valuable educator.
Regretfully, the changes in domestic politics over the last two decades, as well as the liberalization of the media industry, have given birth to intense competition and a lowering of the quality of Taiwanese media. With the way things are often politicized in the country, the media has gradually lost its focus.
Aside from the lack of professionalism, there has been an overemphasis on trivial or sensational inside stories. When the media gradually loses its self-discipline, it becomes a tool for politicians and people with vested interests.
Many believe in the power of the press. This conviction that the media is a powerful tool for swaying voters is what drives some news editors, reporters and call-in show hosts to exaggerate and even make up news stories. The principle of verifying the sources of news has in many cases become nothing but empty talk.
Because of this biased media culture, many have fallen into the typical cycle of political maneuvering. And the result is that the credibility of both the politicians and the media are downgraded. Lee and his talk show are the typical products of the nation's unique and unhealthy politics.
Even the attempts to institutionalize media structure has been tainted by political interference. The establishment of the National Communications Commission as an independent mechanism to examine media operations became an arena for political wrangling last year. The pan-blue camp's nominees secured a majority in the commission, which has sabotaged the credibility of the commission.
Despite all these manipulations, the public will one day wake up to the truth. When the public finally sees the true picture -- as what has happened with some of the allegations relating to the Sogo voucher case -- these political maneuverings and tactics can backfire.
Indeed, there has been a number of complaints from the people on these news reports and shows, which goes to show that in the end it is the public who decides independently of the media. People will pay attention to what they want to, regardless of what the media think is important. The public knows best.
More and more public polls now show that people have become greatly suspicious of the media and increasingly sophisticated in spotting its attempts at manipulation.
The public now sees the media as a kind of special interest group, no more objective than or independent of any other social groups in presenting its view.
Perhaps this is the only constructive way to strengthen media discipline and professionalism. Institutional reform is not perfect and often is only the first step to provide a fair competition environment for the media. Public monitoring constitutes the key to mature media competition and a well-implemented social responsibility of the media.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS