To understand the mindset of the people who try to control the flow of information inside China, it is instructive to look at a recent decision by Chinese officials to censor a few scenes from the blockbuster movie Mission Impossible 3 or MI:3. Did the censors cut scenes of improper sexual activity or full frontal nudity or vulgar language? No, fearful of how the good citizens of China might react to certain scenes filmed in the country last year, the censors cut scenes they felt were insulting to Shanghai and the good name of China.
According to a report in the Hong Kong's South China Morning Post, communist censors were unhappy about scenes showing laundry hanging on bamboo poles and a slow response by police in the movie to a high-speed chase. As a result of this cinematic brouhaha, Tom Cruise fans in China will have to wait until July 20 to see the toned-down action, as the cuts are being made as you read these words.
The censorship of MI:3 is so silly it boggles the mind, but then again, the way the censors work in a mind-controlled communist dictatorship is something we know very well from the history of the former USSR. But look at what happened to the USSR: It eventually fell apart and the doors to freedom and cinematic liberties opened. Could such a fate befall Communist China? Sure, and it will, but the wait for a Chinese Gorbachev to arise and make his or her presence known might take a while.
Meanwhile, another Hollywood blockbuster, Tom Hanks' The Da Vinci Code has been pulled from Chinese cinemas. Earlier this year, there were also reports that Chinese censors had cut a few key scenes from Memoirs of a Geisha -- scenes that belittled Chinese actresses seen cavorting onscreen with Japanese actors.
But these examples are useful when studying how the Chinese propagandists do their work, and, more importantly, how they think. Soviet-era propaganda is now a thing of the past, but when the USSR was in full bloom, film and book and newspaper censors put in long, frightful days snipping this and cutting that -- all to ensure that the Soviet people would think and act the way their puppetmasters wanted them to. Now we see the same laughable behavior in China; but while it's funny, it's also very sad.
Will China ever become a free, democratic country, where people are allowed to think, see and feel the way they want, or will it always remain a Communist Party-controlled dictatorship? Nobody can predict when and how the collapse of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will take place, but one can say with certainty that this Chinese folly cannot last forever in this day of Internet, e-mail and open challenges to state control.
So for this summer, movie audiences in China will have to make do with a watered down version of MI:3 and go on living for another day, when the CCP fades away into the setting sun of history. Until then, the censors will continue having a field day cutting this and banning that, all in the name of the motherland.
Let me tell you something: China is no motherland. It is a puppetland of string-pullers and master craftsmen who control the stage lights and all the exits and entrances. If someone ever tried to make a movie about this tightly controlled puppetland, it would probably come across as a tragicomedy with a deep existential core. And, of course, this make-believe movie would never be allowed to be shown in this very real puppetland because every day is like 1984 in communist China and the sun can't shine in such a dark, rank place.
A silly Hollywood movie is hardly important. But when the state censors get all worked up about showing the dirty laundry of Shanghai to the people, then something is deeply, perversely wrong.
Dan Bloom is a freelancer based in Chiayi.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS