China is experiencing a public health crisis. Infectious diseases that were almost eradicated during the 1960s have reappeared. Beijing acknowledges that diseases like tuberculosis, viral hepatitis, gonorrhea, measles, schistosomiasis and bacillary and amoebic dysentery are reappearing. Making matters worse, new diseases are surfacing. HIV/AIDS has decimated entire villages. In 2003, the SARS epidemic, a disease that had been festering in China since 2002, was unleashed on the world. More recently, the country has been plagued by a particularly virulent strain of avian influenza (bird flu).
The public health care system in China has collapsed. A recent report by the WHO revealed that the country's health system now ranks 144th in the global body, behind Indonesia and Bangladesh. Only 15 percent of the Chinese population is covered by health insurance and even poverty-stricken Vietnam boasts a higher rate of routine childhood immunizations.
Unsurprisingly, China is widely considered to be a major launching pad for infectious diseases.
Beijing is acting to contain the spread of the deadly bird flu virus and taking steps to prevent a global pandemic. It is also making some moves to reform its health care system. These measures deserve praise. Often overlooked, however, is the fact that China is the source of another disease.
China has long suffered from a malady some describe as a "Taiwan complex." Symptoms include an irrational, even schizophrenic, approach to relations with Taiwan. The afflicted embrace the anachronistic "one country, two systems" unification formula, despite the fact that opinion polls in Taiwan reveal that few support it.
They also threaten Taiwan with missiles deployed directly opposite the island -- 784 according to the latest count -- but appear bewildered when polls show that the Taiwanese believe the regime in Beijing is unfriendly toward them. Perhaps most insidious, however, is the tendency of those who suffer from a "Taiwan complex" to consciously spread the problem overseas, thereby threatening the health and safety of the entire global community.
For almost a decade, Taiwan has sought to return to the world's leading health body -- the WHO. In an effort not to rile Beijing, Taipei applies on an annual basis for admission as a "health entity" with "observer" status only. The International Committee of the Red Cross, Rotary International and the Vatican all enjoy observer status. Nevertheless, China has stubbornly blocked Taiwan's admission to the international health body for ten years. Taiwan's continued exclusion from the WHO represents a dangerous "loophole" in global efforts aimed at disease prevention.
After all, Taiwan is a major transportation hub and any virus originating in China could spread to Taiwan and onward to Japan or the US in less than 24 hours. Taiwan's exclusion from the WHO also deprives the developing world of Taiwan's priceless medical assistance and expertise. Perhaps most perplexing, Beijing's intransigence reinforces the Taiwanese public's negative images of China.
The WHO episode shows that this "Taiwan complex" could affect the health and welfare of the international community. But the US Department of State recently revealed that it also jeopardizes the war on terrorism.
In its annual report on terrorist activities, the department declared that China's opposition to Taiwan's participation in international organizations has "impeded broader cooperation on Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) counter-terrorism and nonproliferation initiatives."
The report also noted that China refuses to join the Financial Action Task Force, an international coalition that combats money laundering by terrorists, because Taiwan remains a member of the group. In other words, China's "Taiwan complex" represents a threat to international security.
Some fear that the US administration's recent refusal to allow President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁 to make transit stops in San Francisco and New York indicates that the highest echelons of the US government have succumbed to the "Taiwan complex." One hopes this isn't the case.
As the leader of a full-fledged democracy, any Taiwanese president deserves a modicum of respect. Rather than humiliate Taiwan, the US should ramp up support for the island's participation in the WHO and the global campaign against terrorism. Also, the administration of US President George W. Bush should comply with long-standing policy and convince China to seek a cure for its "Taiwan complex." Beijing must look at its relationship with Taipei in a more creative way.
Small but meaningful gestures -- such as acquiescing to Taiwan's participation in the WHO -- could pave the way for other constructive steps and lead eventually to some sort of reconciliation between the two sides.
Dennis Hickey is professor of political science at Missouri State University.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS